Einstien is more of geometry, some 'things' and forces - Reimannian. In my field, approximation is what makes reality.. Or should i say enough to fool you down to the pixels for a projected images or vids. We used quasi/ monte carlo to simulate lighting. We cant avoid dispersion and noises even...
There are a lot of development on the ontic view to justify the consistency. A loosely closest intuition of direct approximation on observed values. We detect superposition and provide numerous experiments that closely related to that notion.
In Special relativity/GR. They are always critical...
Will there be any implication of the observed value? Especially the dynamics on Quantum state. Like some limitations on visual aspect.
Like for instance. Quantum clock in a superposition of energy eigenstates, the mass–energy equivalence leads to a trade-off between the possibilities for an...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.01789.pdf In line whit LQG which renders time(Tomita time) to evaluated differently.
Would it be possible for a bounce scenario in Blackhole. This is the update from the old paper of Planck Star http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.6562 . -- It is something to with how time...
Old qoute I (Rovelli) argue that the best strategy for understanding quantum gravity is to build a picture of the physical world where the notion of time plays no role. I summarize here this point of view, explaining why I think that in a fundamental description of nature we must "forget time"...
BTW. Not an Expert. The expansion of the universe happens on a larger scale--superclusters and above and in the voids between concentrations of galaxies. The peculiarities of Milky way and Andromeda that belong to a local group, a single cluster of galaxies are moving in one direction- Hubble...
Math has a lot of avenues to do that. We can only extrapolate from observation. It is impossible to know for sure if the universe is truly infinite. The observable universe is definitely finite. Interestingly enough, time is more intriguing than infinity itself.^^
I always thought that time is non physical and besides mathematically it is not needed, and to make sense of reality, we might as well make abstraction of time in our interpretation of Nature.
Somehow, in the case for matter, whatever the conditions, it is always set in motion for whatever...
I understand the importance of time in our equation to make a model of everything we need to measure in reality.
This is as far as i can understand time without using it as extra dimension just to complete the equation and eventually complicates everything.
Either;
Time is the...
Adiabatic, reversible adiabatic, isentropic flow; everything that involve movements/changes has to do with time. And we fill each gaps with time. Time makes perfect sense in every aspect of moving bodies; ie energy, heat, particle etc. Unless time is on a separate body or in a different...
It simply means that time might not exist, just entropy. Or Time is the cause for entropy.
Motion replaces time and time no longer exist. We live in motion not time.
Zero point energy in a vacuum. And maybe it has to do with the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics that particles can't be stop completely. However, some behavior of specific particles interactions came close such as bosons given even number of electrons,protons and neutrons. When...
Take away the concept of time and all we have are observations that are stored in our memory projected as experiences. We still don't have the technology to reached an absolute based starting point for time on a micro level. Well, we do have quantum clock (aluminum ion) near to a zero point...