About time to think about Time

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter junjunjun233
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
junjunjun233
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Old qoute I (Rovelli) argue that the best strategy for understanding quantum gravity is to build a picture of the physical world where the notion of time plays no role. I summarize here this point of view, explaining why I think that in a fundamental description of nature we must "forget time", and how this can be done in the classical and in the quantum theory. The idea is to develop a formalism that treats dependent and independent variables on the same footing. In short, I propose to interpret mechanics as a theory of relations between variables, rather than the theory of the evolution of variables in time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some discussion on Time.
 
junjunjun233 said:
I propose to interpret mechanics as a theory of relations between variables, rather than the theory of the evolution of variables in time.
... which has what to do with the standard model?
Vanadium 50 said:
Do you have a point? Or does everyone have to sit through 3-1/2 hours of video?
A good question. I'll close this thread temporary for moderation.

Please send me another reason for this thread, than just the promotion of Rovelli's views and why you did not place it in classical physics, since your only statement is about mechanics.

It would also be a good service to our readers, if you could specify which points in the videos you want to address. They all can use youtube on their own and don't need an extra promotion. If possible quote a scientific journal where we can read about the positions you want to talk about.