1>
I do not want to include "Humans consciousness" in QM.
I believe consciousness = chemical reaction.
But (some)QM literature makes the act of observing by a human unique.
2>
My main issue with QM is :-
*why should the non-determinism (even in form of probabilities) exists at...
well, any QM literature says "wave-function collapses" when observed.
I inferred that at microscopic level, everything is understood as a probability without any cause of that probability being bizarre.
Eg. cat dead/alive, moon present/absent, Single Photon both a particle and wave.
But on...
I get that quantum phenomenon is not macroscopic.
But is't a macroscopic phenomenon a function of 'n' microscopic ?
If the non-determinism as shown by QM applies to microscopic entities, when do the laws of QM suddenly give up and the law of classical mechanics start ? When we observe.
But why...
Source suggestions ? I have background in higher math and physics being an engineer.
FYI, I mostly read from google.
Links like : http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bell-theorem/
It is ok for physics to distinguish between me and a rock out somewhere on the surface of Mars ? Who am I but a bag of chemicals ?
Why would my action of observing be of any significance ?
Why should the moon be "paged-in"/from-into-existence when I "observe" it and other times it is allowed...