Recent content by LotusPond_14

so if we change the thinking of what really points in space would behave let alone what it really is we will have progress to understand space and time itself? maybe that is the key. because all current mathematics are focused on the dynamics of the objects themselves and we have only have a...

so how can we reconcile the relationship of an object and the points that comprises the object if the points, since they are only treated of as only a concept thus non existent in the physical world? the premise that points are static and translating that space is static led Newton to conclude...

that is correct drakkith. i am only trying to reconcile if the smallest unit of space time (ie. points in any given space plane or space dissect) has importance in the behavior of the objects within space time. i think that the very points in space within space time not only pertains the...

sir matterwave but you are referring to is a frame in spacetime. if we are to say that time is dependent on the motion of an object in space time then if all motion comes to a stop then are you implying that time will also stop?? for example if i am to stop moving am i freezing time as well?? if...

now we are including time but how does time behave in a point in space sir matterwave. if we are then to measure spacetime where x=0, y=0, z=0 is it true that time(t) is also zero?

it is said that space curves on massive objects (relating to relativity) thus it is implied that space changes with respect to mass. so if points are by definition are what comprises space and space changes with respect to mass, then points must be changing to order to define that space changes...

i am only saying that in order to have a dynamic space, a space that responds to objects, the points that comprises space must also be dynamic. there would be a antithesis if in a dynamic space, it comprises of static points. if it does, space surrounding massive objects would have not been...

what if time moves independent of motion. and motion is independent of distance.

assuming that we don't know about gravity, only the objects and the space between it, it can only be deduced that in order for the objects to have activity, the space between the objects must be capable of transmitting the activity produced by the object. and if that space is filled with...

sir bhobba i mean that the very space itself surrounding the two points must have influence and not just on the points themselves ... this in aggreement on julian barboun's work that tells us space is dynamic. for example, if we put two planets with the same distance to each other in a static...

i am not describing the interaction of the points but the interaction of the space surrounding both points, assuming that the distance of the points are far enough to be observed.

its alright sir drakkith. i only observed that when matter is created at a point in space and not from it, then matter will be created at all points in space resulting in non variability. but in reality, this never happened. it is clearly observed that some regions in space have more matter than...

in a way that is correct. because points have zero dimension to begin with. but how is it that matter be created from a point in space and in that point only and not elsewhere?

yes general relativity says that space has no geometry but it has structure. so, if space has structure, then the points which comprises space also has structure. although in mathematics the point is only used as a notion to depict a location, it does not mean that a point is non existent.

but those laws as i researched does not have conformity when describing forces within very small objects and forces that govern massive objects why is that so?? i believe in the notion that all forces operating in a dimension must be the same whether the force is acting on a small object or it...