Recent content by mananvp

Ok. It was my bad. I was trying to understand other way around. Now, I started from 8 possibility of hidden variables configurations for 3 directions and 9 possible directions to be chosen by both observers and I got 72 states and I could find that 5/9 was different result and 4/9 was same...

Sorry to say but I don't get the idea about how choosing different different angles choosing thousands of time come to conclusion that $$P(S_{ame~Result}) \lt P(D_{iff~Result})$$ My curiosity is not ending here. After experiments lot of times we can check for each variant of equation. Let me...

PeroK said: ----------------------------------- On the other hand, if we make a certain choice of angles between A, B and C, then the equality fails experimentally. QM, on the other hand, predicts different probabilities, which do hold experimentally. ----------------------------------- Can...

Ok. so, my understanding is correct so far then I have a question. I have seen an another analogy like when Alice and Bob meet one another and they compare results, if they found different result more than same result then the hidden variable theory is correct. P(different result) > P(same...

Yes. I am also following the same analogy. Like if there are two observer Alice and Bob then if Alice measure spin + in A direction and Bob measure spin + in B direction for the same particles pair. I write it as below P(A+(measured by Alice), B+(measured by Bob)) Thanks for replying

First I give detail of what I think I understood so far. Suppose, there are three angles A, B, C separated by 120° angles. A can measure + (spin up in A direction, we call it A+), and - (spin down in A direction, we call it A-). Same goes for B+, B- and C+, C-. I have choose A direction to...