Recent content by markonline

  1. M

    Speed of light vs speed of time

    does anyone reputable have any comments ?
  2. M

    Speed of light vs speed of time

    i just reckon that it all hasn't been examined using more information that was available than at the time it was theorised. i mean it works reeally well i just believe that there is more to it
  3. M

    Speed of light vs speed of time

    i mmean electromagnetic waves not electromagnetism, I'm on holiday
  4. M

    Speed of light vs speed of time

    so my question is y have the speed of light as a constant if it does change while having the same amount of time dialation(e.g infinite for electromagnetism)
  5. M

    Speed of light vs speed of time

    i submit a question to the physics community. take the whole twin paradox into account. ok. now time is relative to speed, and also gravity, yeah. now in physics we measure the speed of light as a constant though for time it is variable (ultimately due to the effect on us)...
  6. M

    Evidence for infinites at light speed.

    thanks for being perfect and never overlooking anything.
  7. M

    Evidence for infinites at light speed.

    i spose theoretically you could get somewhere really close to the speed of light. is that not good enough. matter has energy traveling in all directions to speed it up to the speed of light it would need to only have energy traveling in one direction.
  8. M

    Evidence for infinites at light speed.

    i meant that with SR there are some inconsistancies. i propagate that the are mear indescressions that have been overlooked by the larger community. one inconsistancy being a lack of proper mathematical development with time dilation matematics. ever hear the term kiss. regardless of how good...
  9. M

    Evidence for infinites at light speed.

    i never said accelerate, i mearly mean travel in one direction as fast as something can possibly be
  10. M

    Evidence for infinites at light speed.

    correctamondo. it would take forever to reach the speed of light unless the boundaries of physics are somehow changed with physics. but light having no mass. being a proton that travels in only direction with no force keeping it at bay does reach the speed of light.
  11. M

    Evidence for infinites at light speed.

    to my liking, hmm. the question being what is the evidence of infinite. that was my answer. and yes i believe it to be consistently inconsistent. why don't you just put everything on the forum about SR. and you can just leave it at that.
  12. M

    Evidence for infinites at light speed.

    ok... lets say that time dilation increases as an exponential rate as velocity increases. now to reach the speed of light, time dilation must equal infinite. while infinity may not be a real number a possible very very large number that goes on forever could take its place
  13. M

    Evidence for infinites at light speed.

    the faster that one travels the more force is need to travel faster, if one is traveling at .99c time is 7x slower therefore he must have 7x more force to accelerate, as this number goes up and up it will take more and more effot to reach c making it impossible.
  14. M

    Time dilation has a direct corelation in the production of gravity

    so if the concept of gravity is known what is being done to try and reverse the effects of gravity to create some sought of propulsion system
Back
Top