Recent content by microdosemishief

  1. M

    How to find eddy current (circular) path in this pendulum experiment?

    Then for the emf resulting from the eddy current, do i use flemings left hand rule to find that direction?
  2. M

    How to find eddy current (circular) path in this pendulum experiment?

    Then do I use right hand thumb rule to find Thanks. Now for a thin plate, why is the eddy current circular? Is it perfectly circular?
  3. M

    How to find eddy current (circular) path in this pendulum experiment?

    So in 1. is it anticlockwise cuz current induced between points C and B go from C to B and for 2. it is clockwise
  4. M

    How to find eddy current (circular) path in this pendulum experiment?

    Regarding using the RHR, my thumb is in direction of motion (parallel to page), my index finger pointing along magnetic field (into or out of page), which leaves third finger for induced current pointing down like gravity or up - this doesnt seem right…
  5. M

    How to find eddy current (circular) path in this pendulum experiment?

    Does the direction my second finger points in indicate the literal direction of magnetic field at that point in space, or do I need to further use right hand rule or something for a circular path around the finger
  6. M

    Electric field due to arc shaped thin rod

    I just read the textbook answer but I want to know why my answer is wrong and not just a different method to the same answer
  7. M

    Electric field due to arc shaped thin rod

    Yes and dE = kdQ/r^2 so the denominator is r^2 where r = Rcos(θ) squared, because dE_x is Rcosθ distance away
  8. M

    Electric field due to arc shaped thin rod

    My attempt: due to symmetry along x-axis, net E is only along x^hat. dQ = λ dl = λ (R dθ) for each dl, the x component of distance from dl to the origin is Rcos(θ) Hence, E_x = \int_{-θ_0}^{θ_0} k(λ R dθ)/(Rcos(θ)^2 = kλ/R \int_{-θ_0}^{θ_0} sec(θ)^2 dθ = 2kλ/R tan(θ_0) along negative x^hat...
  9. M

    Change in Displacement Formulation

    Assuming initial displacement is zero, if x = v₁(t) + ½a(t)², why isnt Δx = x2-x1 = (v₁(t2) + ½a(t2)²) - (v₁(t1) + ½a(t1)²) = v₁(t₂ - t₁) + ½a(t₂² - t₁²) Why is it instead v₁(t₂ - t₁) + ½a(t₂ - t₁)²
Back
Top