Recent content by MiffedMFG1106St

  1. M

    Undergrad How do I find the equivalent statement to the statement ~(p -> ~q)

    It does now, I wasn't paying attention to the rule of starting with the statement in parentheses first, the least dominant statement. Is that correct? BTW, thanks for the help so far.
  2. M

    Undergrad How do I find the equivalent statement to the statement ~(p -> ~q)

    Thanks for your reply honestrosewater. Okay if I play that way ~(~p v ~q) <=> ~[~(p ^ q)] <=> p ^ q Is that the correct process to acquire that answer then. First negate the antecedent and change the conditional to a disjunction. Then does the ~ distribute to both as in my answer above...
  3. M

    Undergrad How do I find the equivalent statement to the statement ~(p -> ~q)

    ~(p -> ~q) <=> ? :confused: I am having a heck of a time figuring this out, and I keep basically wanting to distribute the negation symbol to each individual simple statement in the conditional statement arriving at... ~[~(p -> ~q)] <=> ? ~(~p -> q) <=> ? p -> ~q <=> ~p V ~q <=> ~(p ^ q) But...