Morbert's latest activity
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM."It isn't informative" seems to be a value judgement here. I'm not sure what you mean by "stand on its own". It is quite distinct from... -
Morbert replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.I'm not sure an interpretation has to add anything over and above the interpretation itself, but anyway: This formalism adds a...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Like all established interpretations, it is consistent with quantum theory and hence with experiment. What you get is a simple...
-
Morbert reacted to Ken Wharton's post in the thread A Constrained colliders in entanglement swapping with
Like.
Hi Lucas, Thanks for the question! I’d like to understand your perspective better, in part because it’s something I’ve heard elsewhere... -
Morbert replied to the thread I Can entanglement swapping be explained without nonlocal influences?.I don't understand this. Sorry.
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.The unistochastic formalism won't yield a fundamental ontology in the sense that we do not have a fundamental quantum theory of the...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.@iste What Barandes presents is a correspondence between quantum theories, and theories of unistochastic processes. This seems quite...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Can entanglement swapping be explained without nonlocal influences?.In discussions of instrumentalism, questions like "What is a measurement?", "What counts as a measurement apparatus?", "Where is the...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Can entanglement swapping be explained without nonlocal influences?.Chapter 12 of Asher Peres's "Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods" gives a concrete account of measurement from a modern instrumentalist...
-
Morbert reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”? with Like.
The question is valid under any interpretation, and the procedure for obtaining the answer is always the same. Let's see: - Bohmian...
-
Morbert reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”? with Like.
You don't understand that associating a quantum state with a particle is not the same as measuring it. 1. It's false that what you say...
-
Morbert reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”? with Like.
As I explained in post #116, this is not interpretation-dependent. As the QM textbooks I've mentioned throughout this thread (Zweibach...
-
Morbert reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”? with Like.
No, that's not true. No one shared any references that support the position that "A forward-in-time analysis fails to reproduce the...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?.Have Ma or Zeilinger ever commented on the different interpretations of their experiments? This is not a rhetorical question. I am...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How does the Quantum World Say “Maybe”?.The von Neumann projection postulate does not carve out exceptions for entangled systems. So long as the measurements are projective, an...