Morbert's latest activity
-
Morbert replied to the thread A Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality.I don't understand this paragraph Division events will give rise to more than probability distributions. They will give rise to directed... -
Morbert reacted to A. Neumaier's post in the thread A Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality with
Like.
Possibly of interest: Albert, David Z. (2025) NOTES ON JACOB BARANDES’ VERSION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS. - Preprint... -
Morbert replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.If by no-collapse interpretation you mean interpretations that do not posit collapse as a physically real process, then...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.My obligatory defense of consistent histories The consistent histories formalism is nonstandard in the sense that the construction of...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.As an aside: When we write Bell states like $$\ket{\psi} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\ket{\uparrow}_1\ket{\downarrow}_2 +...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.There are established probabilistic interpretations distinct from objective collapse, and far more mainstream (to the extent that...
-
Morbert reacted to Ken Wharton's post in the thread A Constrained colliders in entanglement swapping with Like.
Hi Lucas -- it sounds like you're reading all this pretty carefully. Yes, the aim is much more a "reformulation" than an...
-
Morbert reacted to gentzen's post in the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real… with Like.
Asher Peres (1978) Unperformed experiments have no results. Rudolf Peierls (1991) In defense of „measurement“.
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Physicists disagree wildly on what quantum mechanics says about real….What is the relation between this paper and your previous work on the thermal interpretation? [edit] - I see section 10.6 probably...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.Remember that the underlying ontology here is the system's classical configuration, and so variables represented by a diagonal matrix in...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.A system (no measurement device) has, say, a variable ##A(t)## with a spectrum of magnitudes ##a_1(t),\dots,a_N(t)## depending on the...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.You cut off the important part: "indivisible quantum theory is a manifestly contextual theory, with a given quantum system’s beables...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.The two distributions are answers to different questions: One distribution answers what the configuration is likely to be, given an...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.The ontological and nomological commitments are straightforward: The system is in a classical configuration, and evolves stochastically...
-
Morbert replied to the thread I Carroll interviews Barandes on Indivisible Stochastic QM.