Thanks for the reply. I think boths answers were sort of beside the point, but i think that was down to my poorly spoken question. What I am wondering is, when theorists apply for post doc positions after completing their Phd, do some take up experiemental research? For instance, a Theoretical...
Maybe not, no, just from the fact that it is harder to get onto a Theoretical Physics Phd program than an experimental program. Is it unheard of though?
Call me crazy, but am I right in thinking that people with a Phd in Theoretical Physics could take up a position in a university as an experimentalist? Is it a strange thing for a theorist to do? Or is it not that black and white? Is it more of a blur? Would theorists be viewed just as capable...
LMAO. Thanks that has cleared up a lot i think. But what is it that distinguishes the twin paradox example from the HK experiment? The fact that twin is taking a different route and the commercial planes went around the world in a circle?
In a few places I have read things along the line of this:
I am getting confused, because some people say this experiment has resolved the paradox and some people think its still a paradox. How exactly has the twin paradox "been verified experimentally" from the HK experiment?
Can anyone tell me what exactly do the variables "Time Dilation" and "Velocity of a fraction of the speed of light" represent (in this graph) from the lorentz contraction?
http://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/figures/gr_timedial.gif
Does the x-axis represent "v/c" or is it "v^2/c^2"? What does...