Recent content by Owen Holden

  1. O

    Venn Diagrams Concepts(including advanced concepts)

    Where is your question?? What does this gibberish have to do with syllogistic logic??
  2. O

    Venn Diagrams Concepts(including advanced concepts)

    Venn diagrams are used to interpret and decide which of Aristotle's syllogisms are vaid or not. There are no 'minimum/maximum' relations here.
  3. O

    Can Anyone Help Prove My Existence?

    x exists, means, there is some confirmable property that x has. (E!x =df EF(Fx)). If it is true that x thinks then x exists. We cannot deny our existence, because the process of denying requires existence. If there is anything that x does or says then that x must exist.
  4. O

    Can Division by 1 Really Be Considered Division?

    Division is a mathematical operation between numbers or functions of numbers. Separating objects into parts is not division. That we can simulate the operation of division applied to pies etc, has restrictive meaning. What would (pie)/pi mean? I don't think there is a knife sharp enough...
  5. O

    Is Classical Logic Inconsistent with Self-Identical Entities?

    Originally Posted by Owen Holden How is it that there is: language, logic or mathematics, if there are no minds. 2+2=4, is only a scrible, if there cannot be an interpretation of the symbols. There cannot be knowledge of: truth, fact, or existence, if there is nobody to understand, can...
  6. O

    Is Classical Logic Inconsistent with Self-Identical Entities?

    Originally Posted by Owen Holden [] means it is logically necessary that. <> means it is logically possible that. These symbols have been a part of standard modal logic since 1918, C. I. Lewis, A Survey of Symbolic Logic. ...where have you been?
  7. O

    Is Classical Logic Inconsistent with Self-Identical Entities?

    [] means it is logically necessary that. <> means it is logically possible that. These symbols have been a part of standard modal logic since 1918, C. I. Lewis, A Survey of Symbolic Logic. ...where have you been? It is empirically true that '(the number of planets)=9', not logically...
  8. O

    Is Classical Logic Inconsistent with Self-Identical Entities?

    If classical logic is inconsistent then so is classical mathematics. A. x=y -> (Fx <-> Fy). This is an axiom of first order logic and it is a theorem of second order logic. (Leibnitz's Law) A is a theorem of Principia Mathematica, *13.15. 1. x=y -> ([](x=x) <-> [](x=y)). therefore...
  9. O

    What is the meaning of a unique inverse for a bijective function?

    x is unique means, there is one and only one thing that x is. 'The' in the particular, in the singular, is the meaning of 'unique'. The definite article 'the' refers to that one and only x. The x such that Fx, is that (unique) x which satisfies Fx. That there is only one x which...
  10. O

    What is Reality? Philosophers' Views

    Reality is all that is the case. What is not the case is not part of reality. Even dreams are partof reality, even if the 'objects' in that dream are not.
  11. O

    Are All Fundamental Particles Truly Pointlike?

    "A point has zero volume, zero area, zero length, and cardinality 1." All geometric concepts have no physical qualities. Points do not have physical qualities at all. "The phrase "X doesn't have volume" means that the concept of volume is inapplicable to X." Wrong again. X has zero...
  12. O

    What is space, vaccuum, or nonexistence?

    What, you are absolutely certain that you are uncertain?? Surely this is self contradictory!
  13. O

    Are All Fundamental Particles Truly Pointlike?

    I don't care at all about your re-defining of words that are clear and distinct. You sound like a theist who wants to define classical words as they please?? Why do you think I should be concerned about your special definition of object etc. If you want to talk about point-objects, then...
  14. O

    Are All Fundamental Particles Truly Pointlike?

    "Originally Posted by Owen Holden What is the size of a point? Surely there are no physical objects of 'one' dimention. Points are (mathematical) geometrical concepts. How does a physical object have size if it has no dimention?? Dimentions are mathematical concepts not physical...
  15. O

    Are All Fundamental Particles Truly Pointlike?

    What is the size of a point? Surely there are no physical objects of 'one' dimention. Points are (mathematical) geometrical concepts. How does a physical object have size if it has no dimention?? Dimentions are mathematical concepts not physical concepts.
Back
Top