Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Trending
Log in
Register
What's new
Latest activity
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Style variation
System
Light
Dark
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
PeroK's latest activity
PeroK
reacted to
Astronuc's post
in the thread
RIP Robert Redford (89)
with
Wow
.
https://www.newsweek.com/robert-redford-dead-hollywood-live-updates-2130559 Apparently Redford was a somewhat poor student, so was...
Sep 16, 2025
PeroK
reacted to
Ibix's post
in the thread
I
What Are the Limits of the Universe According to Cosmologists?
with
Like
.
It might turn out to have a non-zero curvature. But if it truly has a zero curvature we will never be able to confirm that it is not...
Sep 16, 2025
PeroK
replied to the thread
I
Energy*time uncertainty for particle decay
.
A lot of what passes for QM in non-specialist courses is a messy hybrid of QM and classical thinking, IMHO. If I could explain why...
Sep 16, 2025
PeroK
replied to the thread
I
Energy*time uncertainty for particle decay
.
I found a video of an Indian physics professor exploding this myth for his students. He knew they would all have learned the "old"...
Sep 16, 2025
PeroK
reacted to
Herman Trivilino's post
in the thread
I
Energy*time uncertainty for particle decay
with
Like
.
The position-momentum uncertainty principle is alive and well. I don't know the history, but certainly one still sees the erroneous...
Sep 16, 2025
PeroK
reacted to
PeterDonis's post
in the thread
I
Energy*time uncertainty for particle decay
with
Like
.
I note you say (classical). Those textbooks are not focused on QM; they might cover it, but they're not primarily QM textbooks. Which...
Sep 16, 2025
PeroK
replied to the thread
I
What Are the Limits of the Universe According to Cosmologists?
.
The NG article is not worth reading. According to Introduction to Modern Cosmology by Liddle: The Big Bang model is reliable back to...
Sep 16, 2025
PeroK
replied to the thread
I
Energy*time uncertainty for particle decay
.
PS my Internet is down. I think I posted a quotation from Griffiths on this recently if you can find it.
Sep 16, 2025
PeroK
reacted to
JimWhoKnew's post
in the thread
I
Need Help on Particle Spin
with
Like
.
In addition to #2: Elementary particles don't spin. Many of them have non-classical degrees of freedom which are named "spin", because...
Sep 16, 2025
PeroK
reacted to
LarryS's post
in the thread
I
Need Help on Particle Spin
with
Skeptical
.
All elementary particles have an intrinsic spin/angular momentum. The fact that particles spin at all is due to Special Relativity...
Sep 16, 2025
PeroK
reacted to
EigenFox's post
in the thread
Hello from a new member!
with
Like
.
First-year maths undergraduate. I’m interested in real analysis, algebra, calculus and most areas of abstract mathematics. Not a big fan...
Sep 16, 2025
PeroK
replied to the thread
I
Energy*time uncertainty for particle decay
.
Introduction to QM by Griffiths explodes that myth. There are a lot of sloppy textbooks it appears.
Sep 16, 2025
PeroK
replied to the thread
What Determines the Minimum Mass of Block B for Movement on an Inclined Plane?
.
PS if we are being totally precise, doing the mathematical calculation, we will find the maximum mass of A that will not move block B...
Sep 16, 2025
PeroK
replied to the thread
What Determines the Minimum Mass of Block B for Movement on an Inclined Plane?
.
Let's fix the mass of block B (##M##). Start with a small mass of block A ##m##. This moves up and down. The maximum force in the...
Sep 16, 2025
PeroK
reacted to
ojitojuntos's post
in the thread
Help me understand why “Block Universe” is not scientifically proven
with
Like
.
You are correct. While my questions were mostly philosophical, it was very enriching for me to read you and others who engaged with me...
Sep 16, 2025
Forums
Back
Top