PeroK's latest activity
-
PeroK reacted to JimWhoKnew's post in the thread B Is a table levitating possible, even at a minuscule probability? with
Like.
The assumptions of Statistical Physics say that the probability is extremely minuscule. How do we know it is true? We don't. But the... -
PeroK replied to the thread B Is a table levitating possible, even at a minuscule probability?.Or, a fair coin coming up heads 200 times in a row. Or, a pack of cards being randomly shuffled into a given configration. Even these...
-
PeroK reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with
Informative.
I think I see now where is the problem. Many people don't understand very well how randomness arises in classical deterministic... -
PeroK replied to the thread What Determines the Minimum Mass of Block B for Movement on an Inclined Plane?.Okay, that complicates things somewhat! Are we sure block B is not supposed to be sitting at the bottom of the ramp?
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.Yes, but those are probabilities that can be resolved by more knowledge. Determinism means you can get rid of the probabilities with...
-
PeroK replied to the thread What Determines the Minimum Mass of Block B for Movement on an Inclined Plane?.I don't see the problem here. All the analysis is just to convince you that the simple approach works: calculate the force needed to...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.I understand the argument. We possibly risk going round in circles and it becomes a debate about the definition of randomness. Here's...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.The question is whether those uncontrollable stochastic features are fundamental to the statistics of the outcomes? Standard QM allows...
-
PeroK reacted to A. Neumaier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Informative.
Yes. The evolution of the radiated system in a homogeneous medium is generally assumed to be unitary, with an effective dynamics...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.If I understand what you're saying, that sounds like the complement of @Demystifier argument. We start with a macroscopic system that...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.I didn't realise it was impossible to prepare a single radioactive atom and measure its decay time. If so, then I'd need a different...
-
In mm/dd/yy format, 9/16/25 is 32/42/52. In dd/mm/yy, it's 42/32/52, still Pythagorean, but not monotonically sequential.
-
PeroK replied to the thread RIP Robert Redford (89).That was one of the great Oscar travesties. Ordinary People over The Elephant Man and Raging Bull?! Best director and best picture?!
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.I'm back in London, so I'll read your paper today. I'm not convinced that a coin is a good analogy for a quantum system, like a spin...
-
PeroK reacted to Herman Trivilino's post in the thread I Energy*time uncertainty for particle decay with Like.
I would love to see that if you can dig it up.