Recent content by physika

Hi, welcome ! Be careful what you say, because here might tell you that this isn't a place to practice English and that you're coming from a pop-science website.

Anthony Leggett obituary https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01010-z a great theoretical physicist in foundations of physics. (can register for free, for the article)

🙄

There have been some theoretical attempts, but so far nothing concrete (Coarse Graining) same thing for Quantum Darwinism (Wojciech Zurek) and "Spectrum Broadcasting" (Pawel Horodecki) as for objective collapse models, we have to wait for experiments not yet realized, i.e. quantum...

recommend read: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-relational/ ..."There is nothing in RQM that contradicts the assumption that the world is “out there” "In this weak sense RQM is consistent with realism. RQM questions the assumption that each variables of each subsystem of the world has a...

Your words

Your interpretation of Rovelli Ok, Ok.

That's is no Realism. -------------- This is Realism: ....

Collapse Models/Theories* https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/25/4/645 Collapse Models/Theories* https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-collapse/ *(not interpretation)

Right counterfactual definiteness (CFD) of values. ........

We have to wait for experiments using matter wave interferometry, to register quantum superposition on objects of 10¹² atoms at least. Current experimental limit 10⁴

A block universe theory/model ....

You can also read about the models/theories of objective collapse (not interpretation) .....

who knows...

Values of properties are not the issue/point, (up or down, for spin, e.g. or any qualities, magnitudes, values), for realism, the things/events are the issue/point, not values/properties. ......