pines-demon's latest activity
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Ok lets try. Prepare your state in whatever version you prefer ##\int \mathrm d x\, |x\rangle|\pm x\rangle##. Now you have two options...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Fine take ##|p\rangle|-p\rangle## what is the problem of being in the same position? We can figure out the spin or use a boson.
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Experiment.
-
Ppines-demon reacted to martinbn's post in the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons with
Like.
I don't have a prove that something is impossible. My statement is based only on the fact that I have not seen it done. @pines-demon... -
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.What is the issue with that? just take a finite time after that? Why are you focusing on that point? You could instead start with some...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Thanks for stepping in. I hoped that there was something stronger that I was missing. Trying to perform Bell tests on the original EPR...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Does it matter? just prepare the state. Agreed
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Sorry if we are speaking past each other, I wanted an answer to a previous statement of another user, I am not even following the rest...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Take some state like ##|\psi\rangle=\int \mathrm d x\, |x\rangle|-x\rangle## (if you are worried that this is not normalized correctly...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.What is the issue? There are Bell inequalities for continuous variables or you can discretize your space. I mean you measure the...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.why not?
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread Predictions for the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025 (results: John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis).Topological qubits do not exist yet, Microsoft released a fake topological qubit in 2025, but they are not sure if it is topological and...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread Predictions for the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025 (results: John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis).I started the topic, because the first predictions are in. Domenico Fuoco from Polytechnique Montréal wrote a paper "How To Predict The...
-
Ppines-demon posted the thread Predictions for the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025 (results: John Clarke, Michel H. Devoret and John M. Martinis) in General Discussion.Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a...
-
Ppines-demon reacted to Ibix's post in the thread I Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry? with
Like.
But the results won't be exactly symmetric due to experimental error. So how big a deviation can you tolerate? To answer that question...