pines-demon's latest activity
-
Ppines-demon reacted to Morbert's post in the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons with
Like.
As an aside: When we write Bell states like $$\ket{\psi} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\ket{\uparrow}_1\ket{\downarrow}_2 +... -
PThe main discussion, after a lot of background for readers unfamiliar with the topic (the language in bold is the core substance of the...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.What about two electrons? Then you don't have issues because spins handle the symmetrization part.
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.In my defense, this is not an isolated problem. The problem of Bell-testing the original EPR state has been discussed in research. Bell...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.I thought that was clear, I did not wait until you found out, more like I was discussing without knowing that you got something off (I...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Are you saying that the original EPR does not work because particles are spinless (and indistinguishable)?
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.I proposed a state and some operators. You replied by saying that there is no interference in that case. I asked what interference, you...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons.Let's try, but I am not going to go point by point validating your arguments. (Of course, but) I was not sure where the 1/0 vs 1/-1...
-
Ppines-demon reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Does a qubit break interference in the double slit experiment? with Like.
Only if the result of measuring the particle is only consistent with one given result for the qubit. Whether that's the case will depend...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Toponium Discovered.Check this article on how it has been hard to claim that toponium IS a thing: Don’t call it toponium
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Does a qubit break interference in the double slit experiment?.I’m not quoting (myself). I am quoting Jacob Barandes in a podcast. No. Imagine that the qubit is given by the spin of a neutron. Let’s...
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Does a qubit break interference in the double slit experiment?.The screen will measure the particle, but does that imply a given result for the qubit?
-
Ppines-demon reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Does a qubit break interference in the double slit experiment? with Like.
That isn't a quote from @pines-demon. It's @pines-demon quoting from the transcript of the podcast he linked to.
-
Ppines-demon replied to the thread I Toponium Discovered.How many times has this been claimed before?
-
PIf we have ##\psi (0)= \sum_m c_m \psi_m## at ##t=0##, then ##\psi(t)=\sum_m c_m e^{\frac{-iE_m t }{\hbar}} \psi_m## so ##\langle H...