Recent content by rushy

I think these are the equations: KE = 0.5 * moment of inertia * angular velocity squared GPE = linear KE (0.5 * mass * velocity squared) + rotational KE (as above) If I want to find the proportionality statement between the falling masses and the angular velocity of the button. Would I have to...

What do you mean by energy conservation? Provide me with the relevant formulas that can conclude that proportionality.

here is the setup. the button is in the middle and the string is twirled and released to let it spin. The ends are fixed and are connected with hanging masses. Since we know the relationship is that mass is directly proportional to angular velocity squared for a given descent, I want to...

I can't seem to find the link anymore. I will try sending a setup of the experiment of what I mean

I am not sure if the website is reliable but this is the relationship: The hanging mass is directly proportional to angular velocity squared. If that is not the case, could you suggest what the relationship could be with it derived from the equations:

The hanging mass can be inferred as a pulley. As the weight increases, it causes angular velocity to increase thus directly proportional. This relationship I found from the internet by reading some articles but I want to understand how to derive it Yes, the string is fixed.

This button has fixed ends and the string is twirled and on the fixed ends there is hanging masses. I have found out that if string twirls are constant, the hanging mass is directly proportional to angular velocity squared. But I want to understand how that is derived. Could anyone please help...