Recent content by Sonny Liston

  1. S

    Help Solving Renormalization Group Equations

    This isn't a homework problem, but something from a set of notes that I'd like to better understand. My confusion starts on page 23 here: http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1146665.files/III-9-RenormalizationGroup.pdf. I'm having trouble reproducing his calculation for the...
  2. S

    Understanding the Math Behind Homework Equations

    If by "the first term" you mean the \pi^2 term, then yes, the \phi derivative will kill that term; reason being \phi doesn't appear in that term, only its time derivative. Edit: Sorry, I understand what you meant by "first term" now. The first term vanishes at infinity so you can ignore it.
  3. S

    QFT: Scattering Amplitudes in Yukawa Theory

    That was my original thought -- you just couldn't write down sensible diagrams for the process. The wording was what then got me all tangled up thinking diagrams should cancel and whatnot. Thanks for all your help!
  4. S

    QFT: Scattering Amplitudes in Yukawa Theory

    Right, that's part of what I was trying to get at (and expressing poorly) when I said I was having trouble writing down diagrams that made sense. Following the rules for electron/positron arrows produces a diagram that violates the rule concerning arrows flowing into and out of vertices. So I...
  5. S

    QFT: Scattering Amplitudes in Yukawa Theory

    I think I've got my arrows right. I tried to type out the diagrams themselves, but couldn't get it to work so I'll just describe them. Starting from the left: Diagram 1: incoming electron, momentum P, with an arrow to the right flowing toward the first vertex. A scalar line with momentum K...
  6. S

    QFT: Scattering Amplitudes in Yukawa Theory

    Homework Statement I'm working with the Yukawa theory, where the interaction term in the Lagrangian density is g\varphi\overline{\psi}\psi. As an exercise for getting used to using the Feynman rules for the theory, I'm asked to show explicitly (i.e. I'm not allowed to invoke charge...
  7. S

    Landau Quantization: Classical Particle Motion in a Uniform Magnetic Field

    Btw, I don't think I understand why the magnetic flux is a function of the energy here.
  8. S

    Landau Quantization: Classical Particle Motion in a Uniform Magnetic Field

    B\int x(t) v_{y} (t) = B \frac{-(v_{0})^2}{\omega} \int (sin(\omega t)^2) Using (sin(\omega t)^2) = \frac{1 - cos (2\omega t)}{2} and doing the integral, I get \Phi = B\pi(- \frac{v_{0}}{\omega})^2
  9. S

    Landau Quantization: Classical Particle Motion in a Uniform Magnetic Field

    So there is nothing wrong in my reasoning and the flux actually is zero? It seems odd to ask me to evaluate it "as a function of the energy" then.
  10. S

    Landau Quantization: Classical Particle Motion in a Uniform Magnetic Field

    In my notes, I have that it is given by \frac{1}{2\pi}\oint A dx, and the baby E&M book I am looking at says that it can be given by the Area of the surface dotted with the B field times cos(theta), for theta the angle between the B field and the surface. But since the B field is homogeneous...
  11. S

    Landau Quantization: Classical Particle Motion in a Uniform Magnetic Field

    Assuming that's satisfactory, may I ask you one last quick question (you are a saint, by the way. I have been unbelievably useless throughout this.) How would I go about evaluating the magnetic flux through the classical trajectory as a function of the energy? In case you're wondering about my...
  12. S

    Landau Quantization: Classical Particle Motion in a Uniform Magnetic Field

    1 - cos (2 \omega \frac{(2\pi}{\omega}) = 0, so it is appropriately periodic.
Back
Top