Recent content by tav98f

I am pretty sure the calling program takes care of all of that for me. I am running it and I don't seem to be running into any problems except for generating too much data. I need to make some revisions. Thanks for the help, Timothy Van Rhein

Hmmmm... With these issues in mind I may not write to multiple drives. I only have a maximum of three drive available. One hard drive in the tower and two externals. I could also use network drives but I question whether that would be any faster at all. I really do not have any experience...

The subroutine will open a file, append data, and close a file on each call. I did not think about using multiple hard drives. I will consider that. Thanks for the reply, Timothy Van Rhein

I think I got it. The program that calls my subroutine keeps the same process ID for each processor running the program. I think I can use the getpid() function from FORTRAN and write to a file named based on the integer that getpid() returns. Thank you for your time, Timothy Van Rhein

I am still very new to FORTRAN and from many people's view programming in general. When you say a "memory space" I am not sure what you mean. Can you explain this suggestion in more detail? If my notion of memory space is correct then I should remind you that I have no control over...

I am working in FORTRAN I need to avoid writing to the same file at the same time while working in a parallel environment. I have a program (that I have not written and cannot edit) that calls a subroutine (that I have written and can edit). The subroutine is called over and over again by...