Making it even simpler, if you had an object with just one force acting on it, you can apply an equal and opposite force to cancel that force, correct?
I think the Bernoulli equation would work for an incompressible fluid but here you have a gas, so probably not applicable. This has come up before on this forum and here is a link that was referred to: http://www.mcnallyinstitute.com/13-html/13-12.htm
Hopefully that will help.
The way you have it written it looks like you expect the point to be equidistant from both wires. Does that make sense to you, knowing the wires have different currents?
Start by asking what laws of physics is the bead obeying. Usually F=ma is a good place to start, and you know there is no angular acceleration since it is stuck on the wire. Can you write Newtons second law for the bead?
Hi,
How about this question- I can just take a point charge, draw a Gaussian surface somewhere in space that does not enclose the charge, and the total flux through that shell is also zero, but you wouldn't say that the field due to that point charge is zero. What is the difference?
Antenna reciprocity is not an assumption, and you can't violate that under normal circumstances (meaning the antenna behaves linearly). I don't know much else about your problem, but that is certainly true.
It's a reference to the joke about creating perpetual motion using a cat with a piece of buttered toast strapped to its back. I'm pretty sure most people on this website have heard and told that joke multiple times.
Hi; I live in the US and have a PhD. in Electrical Engineering. My area of work is plasma physics. I have also taught introductory physics classes for 10+ years.