Recent content by thefuturism

Anybody?

So, I'm studying for a philosophy midterm, and here's my sample question... "Explain Lewis' reduction of the prisoner's dilemma to two Newcomb's problems. Is the reduction plausible as a solution to the prisoner's dilemma? Explain why it is or why it is not." Okay, so I think I do...

The question is: Show that the following derivability claim holds in SD. (I'll use ">" to stand in for conditional.) {(A > F) & (F > D), ((M v H) v C) > A, ~(M v H) & C} entails D I'm only allowed to use the basic derivation rules of SD: Reiteration (R) Conjunction Intro. (&I) and...