Recent content by thermia

Sure

So you say that immaterial objects can not be super positioned, or ... ?

Thanks for your response. As you may have got, my basic idea was if superposition refers only to physical objects or if immaterial objects such as "knowledge" also can be super positioned. E.g. Your colleague opens the box and knows the state of the cat, but you still don't.

So is the superposition only a matter of definition? Schrodinger's cat's life is in superposition but also our knowledge about it's life is in superposition, or am I taking it too far?

When we say that a partikel - say a photon - is in superposition we assume the partikel itself is in superposition, but as I see it, the partikel is what it is. It is just that we don't know for the moment. So, is the partikel itself in superposition, or is it the answer to the question about...

My breakfast egg this morning was very close to become non existent :-) (Now time for bed)

The way we chose to measure time is of course arbitrary and thus an abstract function. But time it self, regardless of how we measure it, is obviously fundamental physics.

Thank you Riadh for an extensive reply, well worth to consider.

That's an assumption, maybe you are right

I would say, not boring rather inexisting

Interresting, could you elaborate some more about this?

A clever answer, well worth to consider, thank you.

Of course that's correct but only in Eucledian mathematics. My question is about physical dimentions i.e.the "real" world.

Well, that's the wall we allways are running into, aren't we? :-)

Thanks for reply. I understand you see my point :-)