Recent content by vaibhav1803

infinity..?..a professor of mine defined it by this statement which is pretty easy to understand. "pick a number, infinity is a number always greater than any number so chosen." so ultimately infinity is a concept number...our way to imagine the end of a number line, or increasing sequence of...

no, never

nope..we are heavier during day, you'd have been correct provided there was no MOON, the moons gravitational pull is stronger than the sun's ,even when they're on opposite sides of the planet , for the numerical values, they're on google just feed em in the formulae and get your values.

its not always true that friction is`zero in ideal rolling, but two things are implied here on saying "PURE ROLLING OF A RIGID BODY" 1. the Kinetic friction acting is zero 2. Static friction shall act at the sole point of contact having a finite value decided by the forces acting on the...

the "force" and "equal and opposite force" is called action reaction pair and the body moves because the two forces act on different bodies eg. if u push a cart u apply "action"/"force" on the cart while, the "reaction"/"equal & opp. force" acts on you... you must have felt it sometime didn't...

but why should the universe be finite(observable one is no doubt)..? why constrain it to be so, it would be like repeatin speed of light mistake-->"that there's a special referece frame for a special event" its really really dicey topic, isuggest we for now stay cosied up with multiverse one...

only discontinuous..? try, f(x) =[1/x]...where...[y] is the greatest integer less than or equal to y or as you would call, floor(y)...f(1/n) leads to a jump discontinuity one you can never fix, and hence an implied non-differentiability.

What parties..?..(elaborate please.) answer any 1 simple question, Q.what is the probability that on choosing any two numbers the two are relatively prime(no common factor) Q.In an automotive factory, the vehicles are numbered serially, you a common person on an average spot the vehicle with...

Agreed..but for a moment let's have the desert isle picture(we don't know anything but what we see about something) ...or better let the person who posed choose, which would be far wiser than to hav a "whose the better wildcat" thing we both have given our veiws,answers et cetera to a...

I agree Tedjn to a certain extent though, i still stick to my discrete interpretation though, as the removal of caffiene from the body(urination) occurs at the period of one hour, that i consider as "caffiene eleimaination complete", but you have clarified the second model to me which "the Chaz"...

completely possible, any reason why it shouldn't happen?

M=\oint\rho \partial V ...it isn't allowing latex preview so there's supposed to be a volume element \partial V in there in case its missing. for a constant density case, M =\rho V the rest i believe you can figure out yourself...through the equation

@Liparulo, please make the problem statement more clear to me, and i think you must have arrived at the solution by now,(there is no effect after 14.36 hours)..and its quite the time the thread be closed so it won't be spammed, for any further details on the solution you may contact me by...

ok, i have 1 question. so when after a coffee/any drink do you immediately, go to the bathroom and spend the rest of your life pissing..? or do you visit the loo after a certain period of time.. look kid, i took in a sane assumption that the person is human..and no caffiene seperating...

the point is that the guy who having the cola is taking it on an hourly basis, so we must calculate it as a discrete-input function... now we'd require a DE to find the solution only if the guy has a cola dispenser installed in his bathroom, from which he continuosly drinks while excreting...