Recent content by Vrareti

The "less" part of this question is troubling me. Can it be that energy can pass through but if at any given time energy reaches this threshold you talk about which I'm calling mass, then and only then it gets trapped?

So what has GR failed to predict until now?

I'm sorry but I will again mention that I don't have a strong physics background. I'm a software developer and I use logic to solve problems. I know you need a mathematical theory to even consider this as an alternative theory. But I'm not presenting it like this, am I? I'm just asking questions...

So after thinking about it again and since I haven't received any answer yet I'll go on speculate on something more. We consider mass to be a property of matter. What if we're actually wrong and mass is not actually a property of matter but it's a property of spacetime that specifies how...

I'd like to see more comments about this please and from more people.. Can you think of anything that makes this statement false? Gravity is a spacetime anomaly that causes mass when (and if) energy gets trapped by it

But are we sure that we first move the mass and then gravity follows? Or can it be that the gravitational field first changes in a specific point and the energy trapped in it gets displaced.

We know for sure that in a sunny day: 1) if my shadow exists I'm there right next to it 2) if i exist my shadow is right next to me 2 completely different facts and my question is like this: 1) if mass exists then gravity is right next to it <-- proven 2) if gravity exists then mass is right...

Another question.. If gravity is a property of spacetime, do you need mass to create gravity or do you need gravity to create mass? Which one of these two came first? In my mind gravity is the anomaly of spacetime in a specified position. Are we certain - is it proven - that mass creates this...

This theory makes more sense to me than any other definition of mass out there. Where can I find more about it?

Does an electron have mass? I like this definition of "mass", although I don't kind understand the active and passive gravitational mass yet (but i'll try rereading that section many times). A question comes up from reading all of this: Has anyone tried to unify all these kinds of mass into...

http://www.quietbay.net/Science/astronomy/nightsky/ This is probably the best way to start.. I know it helped me a lot

So about this Grid.. Is it like a simple grid? Like lots of intersections and sides? What shape does it have? How many dimensions? Is it a hypercube? A cube? Is mass a property of the intersections or the sides? Am I understanding this correctly or am I thinking about something completely different?

Although I can't understand most of it since I don't have a very strong physics background, I think that's exactly what I'm talking about! Well as I said I can't understand any of the definitions of mass I could find. Can you tell me what mass is in simple words? (I'd really like a...

After reading countless stuff on wikipedia I think that there's no definition for mass which I can understand (either that or there's no definition for it yet and we're waiting for LHC to come up with one). I came to the conclusion that we understand more stuff about gravity than mass and that's...