Q: Scavenging energy from EM-fields, general ideas

Click For Summary
High electromagnetic (EM) fields generated by transformers can potentially be harnessed to power small sensors, but practical energy scavenging may yield limited results. The discussion highlights that while energy harvesting has gained interest, the reality often involves low energy levels that are difficult to utilize efficiently. Techniques such as using coils or Hall sensors to detect EM fields are mentioned, but the effectiveness of these methods in generating sufficient power for devices is questioned. Additionally, historical methods for measuring RF noise in generators indicate that while information can be gathered about machinery health, the energy available for harvesting may not justify the investment. Overall, careful consideration of the actual energy potential is essential before pursuing this topic for a thesis.
billybomb87
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone!

I'm looking for general ideas on how to take advantages of high EM-fields created in for example , let's say, a transformer to energize a small sensor. I am not looking for specific ideas like placement, voltages etc.

The reason for me asking is that this probably will be the topic of my master thesis, I'm heading for an interview on Wednesday and I want to would like to be as prepared as possible as I can because I know the guy will ask about how it can be done and which one would be the best fit for this project, or maybe try all the methods to see which one is the best suited for different situations.

So help me out guys, your help is much appreciated!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
i used to work in a power plant.

the machinery makes surprisingly little external magnetic field.
to put it simply: if the machine is letting its magnetism get out there's something bad wrong with it .
Exceptions are air core inductors that are used to limit fault current in buswork, and the main three phase wires coming out of the generator. Both had substantial 60 hz fields because they were carrying kiloamps.. I could get several tenths of a volt induced in my "flux detector " whhich was a coil of ten turns encompassing 0.1 m^2. I suppose a a Hall sensor would have worked also. Nowadays you can buy solidstate gauss detectors.

Another troubleshooting hint is to take a cheap AM transistor radio, tune it netween stations and simply hold it to your ear as you walk around the machinery. Any corona from leaky insulation will announce itself on your radio but it's difficult to hear when standing adjacent a noisy several thousand hp motor. Headphones help. Again premise is, if the machine is electrically noisy it needs some attention.
That one you should try yourself - take a cheap transistor radio and walk the power lines in your neighborhood early in the morning when everything is wet with dew. You'll find the dirty insulators.

Lastly there were some IEEE papers in 1970's about noise masurement in central station generators. They placed a donut style current transformer around neutral lead of the generator and measured its RF noise in vicinity of 1 mhz. An increase would indicate insulation is degrading someplace allowing corona. Now 1 mhz is right in middle of AM broadcast band so they had to use a narrowly tuned voltmeter. The transistor radio technique i described earlier is poor man's version of that instrument.

in summary - i will be surprised if you can scavenge energy enough to use for powering instruments or charging batteries
but there's plenty to convey information about the machine.

i hope this helps with your interview.
Good luck in your studies.. i wish i were more academic.

old jim
 
Last edited:
billybomb87 said:
Hey everyone!

I'm looking for general ideas on how to take advantages of high EM-fields created in for example , let's say, a transformer to energize a small sensor. I am not looking for specific ideas like placement, voltages etc.

The reason for me asking is that this probably will be the topic of my master thesis, I'm heading for an interview on Wednesday and I want to would like to be as prepared as possible as I can because I know the guy will ask about how it can be done and which one would be the best fit for this project, or maybe try all the methods to see which one is the best suited for different situations.

So help me out guys, your help is much appreciated!

You may already know this, but "Energy Harvesting" has gotten more attention the past few years, because of the potential uses for small RF sensors/devices:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_harvesting

The more energy you can harvest from light, vibration, external fields (your example), the longer your device's batteries will last...
 
The term 'harvesting' is very loaded. It conjours up visions of limitless supplies of free energy, there for the taking. I don't think that reality is as good as that.

Low levels of em or thermal energy are very difficult to use. In the case of 'heat harvesting' you would be dealing with a device that would be, basically, a heat engine, working with source and sink temperatures which would be very little different.This implies extremely low thermodynamic efficiency - less than could be gained by just improving the system from which you are trying to harvest the waste energy. Low levels of em energy would need to involve large structures in the form of coils or long wires which would need to be matched to some form of detecting device in order to, perhaps, charge batteries. Very low initial voltages, followed by the unavoidable 'diode drops' would surely militate against worthwhile energy gathering per unit of money spent on the equipment. Again, more juice in the lemon of improving electrical efficiency in the first place.
The actual numbers count in matters like this and, before investing effort into any long term study, it really would be worth while calculating just how much actual energy may be available in the first place.
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K