Random Photos

  • Thread starter Thread starter morrobay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photos Random
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread features a collection of random photos shared by participants, encompassing various subjects such as landscapes, wildlife, and personal experiences. The discussion includes comments on the photos, questions about techniques, and reflections on the memories associated with the images.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Participants share a variety of photos, including landscapes from Central Park, autumn scenery, and wildlife encounters.
  • Some participants inquire about the techniques used to capture certain images, such as whether a photo was taken from a drone or a window.
  • There are discussions about specific details in photos, such as the appearance of clouds and shadows in mountain images.
  • One participant shares a story about a pet cat and relates it to the theme of unpredictability in experiments.
  • Another participant mentions a photo contest and reflects on past submissions and votes received.
  • There is a mention of a specific fungus or mold growing on a branch, with one participant speculating on its identity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share their photos and experiences without reaching a consensus on specific technical aspects or interpretations of the images. Multiple viewpoints and interpretations are present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about photographic techniques and the conditions under which photos were taken, which are not fully explored or resolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in photography, nature, and personal storytelling may find the shared experiences and insights valuable.

  • #2,431
Ivan Seeking said:
New kind of UFO?
Tell the internet!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2,432
BillTre said:
New kind of UFO?
Tell the internet!
Sea Drone!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #2,433
Ivan Seeking said:
Sea Drone!
Yes, I see it.
 
  • #2,434
BillTre said:
Yes, I see it.
No, Sea, not See, see?
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #2,435
Ivan Seeking said:
No, Sea, not See, see?
You are droning on about this!
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: phinds and Ivan Seeking
  • #2,436
It is said to be a superior mirage, but I believe all mirages are equal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre and phinds
  • #2,437
Images of (wood) fire:

Untitled 2.jpg


Untitled 3.jpg


It's a lot like photographing smoke- both are very dynamic fluid-like objects without sharp edges to focus on. Nikon D810 + Nikkor 105/1.4 @ f/4.5, 1/4000 s shutter, cropped as needed.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Astranut, Ivan Seeking, morrobay and 4 others
  • #2,438
Ivan Seeking said:
It is said to be a superior mirage, but I believe all mirages are equal.
Several years ago, I was on a side-road out in the desert. There was a highway perhaps a mile away, and apparently a rather strong temperature inversion.

Above the horizon I could see individual cars traveling the highway - but they were upside-down!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, Ivan Seeking, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #2,439
Tom.G said:
Above the horizon I could see individual cars traveling the highway - but they were upside-down!
I've read about this. Apparently its a well understood type of mirage. It would be neat to see one, as you have.
 
  • #2,440
Last picture from Eastwood.
I loved this place in the 80s. Not sure what happened with this tree, the valley protects the trees from the wind.
Disease possibly.

IMG_20241226_132053_179~2.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ivan Seeking and collinsmark
  • #2,441
Guess who.

1735494271102.png
 
  • #2,442
Ivan Seeking said:
Well. That is easier on the eye than my fallen tree.

Is she famous?
 
  • #2,443
pinball1970 said:
Well. That is easier on the eye than my fallen tree.

Is she famous?
YES and yes.
 
  • #2,444
Ivan Seeking said:
YES and yes.
Ursula Andres?
 
  • #2,445
Ivan Seeking said:
YES and yes.
If I'm wrong no clues please
 
  • #2,446
no
 
  • #2,447
candice bergen

From Soldier Blue
 
  • #2,448
No but I can completely see why you would guess that.
 
  • #2,449
Ivan Seeking said:
No but I can completely see why you would guess that.
Ok. Please no clues this is now my raison d'etre.
 
  • #2,450
pinball1970 said:
Ok. Please no clues this is now my raison d'etre.
That wasn't a clue. :cool:
 
  • #2,451
Is it Cher!?
 
  • #2,452
No
 
  • #2,453
Ivan Seeking said:
No
Cher a long shot. She changed a lot.

Janet Agren, beautiful, blonde, low body fat, viking.
 
  • #2,454
Negative
 
  • #2,455
Ivan Seeking said:
Negative
Why do I get the feeling @Vanadium 50 would just get this straight away?
Ok, I need to re-think.
 
  • #2,456
Ivan Seeking said:
No
Faye Dunaway
 
  • #2,457
Andy Rooney!
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: WWGD and pinball1970
  • #2,458
pinball1970 said:
Ok. Please no clues this is now my raison d'etre.
Ivan might not be giving clues, but I will.

Americans would say she's a first, of sorts, in the figurative realm of lady-like qualities.

(Sadly though, they won't be saying this after next month, without additional qualifiers.)
 
  • #2,459
collinsmark said:
Americans would say she's a first, of sorts, in the figurative realm of lady-like qualities.
Ok, now I need to know.
 
  • #2,460
1735499693742.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K