Mag 7.6 - 73 km ENE of Misawa, Japan, tsunami warning issued

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the recent M 7.6 earthquake near Misawa, Japan, including its depth, potential tsunami impact, and aftershocks. Participants explore the tectonic context of the region, the relationship to past seismic events, and the characteristics of aftershocks following the main quake.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the depth of the earthquake (53.1 km) and suggests that this depth may limit the significance of any tsunami, contrasting it with the Great Tohoku earthquake.
  • Another participant provides surveillance videos of the earthquake response in Aomori prefecture, indicating a focus on real-time observations.
  • A participant reports a strong aftershock (M 6.6) and mentions other aftershocks ranging from magnitudes 4.4 to 5.8.
  • One contributor states that the M 7.6 quake is located far north of previous significant events and expresses confidence that it is outside the aftershock zone of those events.
  • Another participant discusses the significance of the quake, suggesting it is not directly related to the Mw 9.1 megathrust earthquake from 2011, but may be influenced by changes in stress fields along the subduction zone.
  • Some participants describe the recent series of quakes as thrust events typical of subduction zones, referencing moment tensor solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between the recent earthquake and past seismic events, particularly the 2011 Mw 9.1 earthquake. There is no consensus on whether the recent quakes are part of the same aftershock sequence or represent a separate series of events.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the complexity of the tectonic setting, including the influence of multiple tectonic plates and microplates in the region. There are unresolved questions regarding the implications of the depth of the earthquake and its potential tsunami impact.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to seismologists, geologists, and those studying tectonic activity in the Japan region, as well as individuals monitoring earthquake responses and aftershock patterns.

Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,510
Reaction score
7,439

M 7.6 - 73 km ENE of Misawa, Japan​

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000rtdt/executive
  • 2025-12-08 14:15:11 (UTC)
  • 40.960°N 142.185°E
  • 53.1 km depth
It was however fairly deep (53.1 km depth) as compared to the Great Tohoku earthquake in which the sea floor was displaced. I don't believe a tsunami would be significant.

Seismotectonics of Japan and Vicinity​

The North America plate, Pacific plate, Philippine Sea plate, and Eurasia plate all influence the tectonic setting of Japan, Taiwan, and the surrounding area. Some authors divide the edges of these plates into several microplates that together take up the overall relative motions between the larger tectonic blocks, including the Okhotsk microplate in northern Japan, the Okinawa microplate in southern Japan, the Yangzee microplate in the area of the East China Sea, and the Amur microplate in the area of the Sea of Japan.

The seafloor expression of the boundary between the Pacific and North America plates lies 300 km off the east coasts of Hokkaido and Honshu at the Kuril-Kamchatka and Japan trenches. The subduction of the Pacific plate beneath the North America plate, at rates of 83-90 mm/yr, generates abundant seismicity, predominantly as a result of interplate slip along the interface between the plates. The 1958 M 8.4 Etorofu, 1963 M 8.6 Kuril, 2003 M 8.3 Tokachi-Oki, and the 2011 M 9.0 Tohoku earthquakes all exemplify such megathrust seismicity. The 1933 M 8.4 Sanriku-Oki earthquake and the 1994 M 8.3 Shikotan earthquake are examples of intraplate seismicity, caused by deformation within the lithosphere of the subducting Pacific plate (Sanriku-Oki) and of the overriding North America plate (Shikotan), respectively.

At the southern terminus of the Japan Trench the intersection of the Pacific, North America, and Philippine Sea plates forms the Boso Triple Junction, the only example of a trench-trench-trench intersection in the world. South of the triple junction the Pacific plate subducts beneath the Philippine Sea plate at the Izu-Ogasawara trench, at rates of 45-56 mm/yr. This margin is noteworthy because of the steep dip of the subducting Pacific plate (70° or greater below depths of 50 km depth), and because of its heterogeneous seismicity; few earthquakes above M 7 occur at shallow depths, yet many occur below 400 km. The lack of large shallow megathrust earthquakes may be a result of weak coupling at the plate interface, or simply a reflection of an incomplete earthquake catalog with respect to the length of typical seismic cycles.

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000rtdt/region-info
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, BillTre and berkeman
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Some surveillance vidoes of the earthquake response in Amori prefecture, Japan.




 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
Astronuc said:

M 7.6 - 73 km ENE of Misawa, Japan​

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000rtdt/executive
  • 2025-12-08 14:15:11 (UTC)
  • 40.960°N 142.185°E
  • 53.1 km depth

Am late posting again haha

M7.6 Japan quake on my seismo (Sydney, Australia) this morning
The location for this event is a long way north of the previous large events in the region and I would be confident in saying that it is well outside the aftershock zone of those events

updated info.....

M 7.6 - 2025 Aomori Prefecture, Japan Earthquake​

    • 2025-12-08 14:15:10 (UTC)
    • 41.043°N 142.141°E
    • 44.1 km depth

    1765498993901.webp

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and Astronuc
Another strong aftershock just tailed off on my seismo

M 6.7 - 114 km ENE of Hachinohe, Japan​

  • 2025-12-12 02:44:11 (UTC)
  • 40.918°N 142.745°E
  • 10.7 km depth
1765520028356.webp
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
This has been a significant quake and not directly related to the Mw9.1 megathrust quake that occurred on 11 March 2011 at 05:46 UTC which has produced some significant aftershocks since 2011, particularly during the 2021 - 2022 period when many M6+ to M7+ events occurred within the aftershock zone.

I would like to suggest that this latest series of quakes, that include the 3 largest ones of Mw7.6, 6.6 and 6.7 appear to be far enough north of the aftershock zone of the Mw9.1 to produce a distinctly separate series
of events.
The only direct relationship would be that they are all on the subduction zone of the Japan Trench.
A possible indirect relationship could be the change in stress fields along the subduction zone as a
result of the Mw9.1 event. This is generally most easily observable at either end of a rupture zone.

Japan quakes 2011 - 2025.webp


These are thrust events, typical of subduction zones and moment tensor solutions as shown below...

Moment Tensor Solution.webp


cheers
Dave
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and Bystander

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
879
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K