High School Audio frequency of a humidifier

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
24,124
Reaction score
8,255
TL;DR
Trying to figure out something - anything - about this annooying noise from my humidifier
Brought out a small humidifier much like this Homedics Ultrasomic Humidifier:
1766885198742.webp

to humidify my bedroom.

It makes a whine that is piercing when the room is very, very quiet, like when you're trying to fall asleep. The whine has number of harmonics, the lower ones simply buzz, which is perfectly fine, like white noise, but the high pitched note is a pure, perfect sine wave - you know, like a synthesizer on default settings.

The lower ones are pretty immune to self-interference, but the purity of the highest note makes it very susceptible to self-interference.

I manage to lie with my right ear in the spot where the frequency is loudest. I assume constructive interference requires either two identical sources or a good reflecting surface somewhere. I don't know why a humidifier would have two sources, and this device does seem to make the make the same noise whether on the floor, on the dresser, or at either end of the room, so I'm not sure it's a reflection. I've movrd it aorund a litte, pointing it this way and that, to see if it alters the location of the nodes, but not much luck so far.

Where do you suppose I'm getting self-interference from?

Anyway, I found a second spot with maximum constructive interference about a foot away from the first (alas, it puts my head almost off the edge of the mattress, so untenable).

I tried to use a(n online) frequency analyzer, but it's too faint to register.

I also tried to match it to a played tone, but its very hard to do. It's somewhere in the ballpark of 2.5-5 kHz.

Two aspects: one scientific, one practical.

Can I deduce its freq from the node distance? Also,can I baffle it somehow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DaveC426913 said:
Can I deduce its freq from the node distance? Also,can I baffle it somehow?
If we knew the exact model number, we could look up the operator's manual.

The complexity of resonance, in a living space, would make it difficult to identify the path geometry. To identify the nodes, you would need a simpler adjustable organ pipe. Alternatively, you could record the sound with a mobile phone or computer, then take the FFT to see the spectrum. Post the waveform and the spectrum here.

To baffle the sound, you would need to disrupt the resonance of the room. Maybe hang a heavy curtain on a wall, especially near a three corner reflector, such as is made where two walls meet at the ceiling.

You should not be able to hear ultrasonics. Maybe it generates short trains of ultrasonic pulses, and it is that you are hearing. Does it have a switching power supply that is noisy, or which might beat with the ultrasonics?

Maybe, something like the plastic case, is oscillating mechanically. To identify what is resonant, run your hands over the device, twist it, and lift it off the surface A ballast weight of modelling clay might then be used to prevent the oscillation detected.
 
Baluncore said:
If we knew the exact model number, we could look up the operator's manual.
Homedics UHE-CM65

https://www.manualslib.com/manual/1350286/Homedics-Uhe-Cm65.html?controller=view#manual


Baluncore said:
The complexity of resonance, in a living space, would make it difficult to identify the path geometry. To identify the nodes, you would need a simpler adjustable organ pipe. Alternatively, you could record the sound with a mobile phone or computer, then take the FFT to see the spectrum. Post the waveform and the spectrum here.
It seems to be too quiet for my mike to pick up. But maybe I will post it and someone can pull the signal out.


Sorry. PF does not accept .wav files or .mp3 files. Oh well.

It's a pity I have to guess what it will accept. I'll try converting it to antoher type, and after I have oen of those Ill see of the uploader recognizes it. There's no other way I know of find out what PF will accept. I'm just rolling the dice here - crapped out twice so far.

Update: Nope. PF does not accept any form of uploaded audio file. :mad:

I will post it to my personal webhost and link to it.




Baluncore said:
To baffle the sound, you would need to disrupt the resonance of the room. Maybe hang a heavy curtain on a wall, especially near a three corner reflector, such as is made where two walls meet at the ceiling.
I would have thought that almost any movement would destroy the consructive interference.

Baluncore said:
You should not be able to hear ultrasonics.
Def not ultrasonic. I can hear at least into the 13k range. This is less than 4k or thereabouts



Baluncore said:
Maybe it generates short trains of ultrasonic pulses, and it is that you are hearing. Does it have a switching power supply that is noisy, or which might beat with the ultrasonics?
Buh?

Baluncore said:
Maybe, something like the plastic case, is oscillating mechanically. To identify what is resonant, run your hands over the device, twist it, and lift it off the surface A ballast weight of modelling clay might then be used to prevent the oscillation detected.
Hard to believe. Again, it's not the buzzing. This is a pure sinusoidal waveform.

(I learned a little about waveforms when I was deeply into customizing music on the SID Editor for my C=64.)
 
Last edited:
Listening to it in bed. It might even be less than 2.5kHz. I think it could be doable on a piano.

When I was trying to get a freq reading with an analyzer, there was a peak at 1012Hz. C5 on a piano is somewhere near 1000Hz.
 
Does the fan have a brushless DC motor?
Can you change the fan speed?
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
6K