Why Does the Simultaneity Equation Use Gamma Squared?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter skynelson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simultaneity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the simultaneity equation in the context of special relativity, specifically the equation t' = gamma (t - Lv/c^2). The confusion arises from the presence of the gamma factor in both the time dilation and simultaneity components. The equation is validated through the identity t/gamma = gamma (t - Lv/c^2), confirming that the second gamma accounts for the transformation between frames. The correct interpretation emphasizes that the second gamma is necessary for maintaining consistency in the relativistic framework.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity principles
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations
  • Knowledge of time dilation concepts
  • Basic grasp of mathematical manipulation in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Explore the implications of gamma in relativistic equations
  • Investigate the relationship between simultaneity and relative motion
  • Review advanced topics in special relativity, such as spacetime diagrams
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching special relativity, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of time dilation and simultaneity in relativistic contexts.

skynelson
Messages
57
Reaction score
4
I have poured over my old college textbook (Mould) in its description of simultaneity. I came across one sticking point that I don't understand.

The proper equation to describe the relative time between two different points is:

Eqn 1) t' = gamma (t - Lv/c^2)

This equation makes sense to me because I thought I understood simultaneity (the offset factor of Lv/c^2) as well as time dilation (the factor of gamma when changing into the moving/primed frame).

However, the book then inserts another factor of gamma (ostensibly from the t'). Didn't we already account for time dilation with the first gamma?

I know the book is right, since the following reduces properly to an identity:
t/gamma = gamma (t - Lv/c^2)

I just don't understand the logic/physics of it. Yes, of course t' = t/gamma, but we already included that gamma in the right half of equation 1, right?

Why do we have gamma^2? What does that MEAN?
I've pummeled my brain for 6 months on this issue ;-) I think it's time to ask.
Thanks!
Sky
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, of course t' = t/gamma
No, that is a derived result and only valid for L=vt, i.e. at the position of a moving clock. You should write x instead of L to make clear that we're talking about a space coordinate here.
Eq. 1) is the one and only equation to use (of course in combination with x'=gamma(x-vt/c²)), not t'=t/gamma.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
5K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K