Interpreting Distance-vs-Time and Accel-vs-Time Graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter rejz55
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
AI Thread Summary
To interpret distance-vs-time and acceleration-vs-time graphs, the area under the velocity curve represents distance, calculated using the integral of velocity over time. The acceleration is determined by the slope of the velocity curve, with undefined acceleration points indicating instantaneous changes, such as collisions. Initially, a negative velocity indicates movement in one direction, while a subsequent positive velocity indicates a rapid change in direction. As the velocity decreases linearly, the acceleration remains constant, allowing for straightforward calculations of distance using triangular area formulas. Summing the distances with appropriate signs provides the total distance traveled, while analyzing each segment's slope yields the corresponding accelerations.
rejz55
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
View attachment Doc1.doc

how am i going to interpret the distance-vs-time and the acceleration-vs-time of this graph?
Thanks!
(the y-axis is the velocity and the x is the time- attached file)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The dist will be the usual area under the curve, with proper signs.

The accn is the slope of the curve, all constants in this case, with a few points where the accn is undefined.
 
Shooting star said:
The dist will be the usual area under the curve, with proper signs.

The accn is the slope of the curve, all constants in this case, with a few points where the accn is undefined.

Can you elaborate your explanation pls..Thanks..I have my few interpretations here..I just do no Know if they are right..Thanks..(see the attached file)
 

Attachments

In a speed vs. time graph, the area under the curve gives you the distance, since the distance is integral vdt. I hope you know this. The accn is dv/dt, and so the slope of the tangent at a point represents the accn.

Look at the start: the v is -5 m/s for some time t1 (not specified). So, the particle is moving left (say), and the dist covered will be the product of -5*t1 (in metres). It’s negative.

Next, at a single instant, the speed becomes +5 from -5, showing that accn is infinitely large and not defined at that instant. Typically, this represents an impulsive force acting for a very short time (what we call collisions).

Then the speed decreases linearly from 5 to 0, and the accn is uniform because the slope of the graph is constant. The accn a= (0-5)/t2 m/s/s. The dist is the area of the triangle, giving the formula d= ½ v0*t2.

Then the speed is zero => dist covered is 0 and accn =0.

You get the drift, I hope. At the end, you can sum up all the distances, with proper signs, to find the total dist travelled. Find the accns for each of the segments by finding the slope.
 
Thanks shooting star..:smile:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top