Interpreting Distance-vs-Time and Accel-vs-Time Graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter rejz55
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around interpreting distance-vs-time and acceleration-vs-time graphs, specifically focusing on the relationships between velocity, distance, and acceleration as represented in these graphs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of areas under curves and slopes in the context of distance and acceleration. There are attempts to clarify the implications of velocity changes and the nature of acceleration at specific points. Some participants express uncertainty about their interpretations and seek further elaboration.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various interpretations and attempts to clarify concepts related to the graphs. Some participants have provided insights into the mathematical relationships, while others are seeking confirmation of their understanding. There is an ongoing exploration of different aspects of the graphs without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific points in the graphs, such as negative velocities and undefined accelerations, indicating a focus on particular scenarios within the broader context of graph interpretation. There is mention of attached files that may contain additional information relevant to the discussion.

rejz55
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
View attachment Doc1.doc

how am i going to interpret the distance-vs-time and the acceleration-vs-time of this graph?
Thanks!
(the y-axis is the velocity and the x is the time- attached file)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The dist will be the usual area under the curve, with proper signs.

The accn is the slope of the curve, all constants in this case, with a few points where the accn is undefined.
 
Shooting star said:
The dist will be the usual area under the curve, with proper signs.

The accn is the slope of the curve, all constants in this case, with a few points where the accn is undefined.

Can you elaborate your explanation pls..Thanks..I have my few interpretations here..I just do no Know if they are right..Thanks..(see the attached file)
 

Attachments

In a speed vs. time graph, the area under the curve gives you the distance, since the distance is integral vdt. I hope you know this. The accn is dv/dt, and so the slope of the tangent at a point represents the accn.

Look at the start: the v is -5 m/s for some time t1 (not specified). So, the particle is moving left (say), and the dist covered will be the product of -5*t1 (in metres). It’s negative.

Next, at a single instant, the speed becomes +5 from -5, showing that accn is infinitely large and not defined at that instant. Typically, this represents an impulsive force acting for a very short time (what we call collisions).

Then the speed decreases linearly from 5 to 0, and the accn is uniform because the slope of the graph is constant. The accn a= (0-5)/t2 m/s/s. The dist is the area of the triangle, giving the formula d= ½ v0*t2.

Then the speed is zero => dist covered is 0 and accn =0.

You get the drift, I hope. At the end, you can sum up all the distances, with proper signs, to find the total dist travelled. Find the accns for each of the segments by finding the slope.
 
Thanks shooting star..:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
746
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K