LHC First Collisions: Thursday Scheduled

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vanadium 50
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions Lhc
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is scheduled for its first collisions on Thursday, contingent upon resolving a transformer failure at point 8. Initial collisions will occur at an injection energy of 450 GeV, with two bunches per beam, one collision at Point 1 (ATLAS) and another at Point 5 (CMS). The expected luminosity is approximately 10^27 /cm2/s, significantly below design specifications. Following a two-month downtime due to a helium leak incident, the LHC aims to achieve full energy operations by early spring 2009.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of LHC operational principles and scheduling
  • Familiarity with particle collision energy levels, specifically 450 GeV and 5 TeV
  • Knowledge of luminosity metrics in high-energy physics
  • Awareness of quenching phenomena in superconducting magnets
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of LHC luminosity on collision data quality
  • Study the effects of quenching in superconducting magnets and their impact on collider operations
  • Explore the long-term operational schedule and upgrades planned for the LHC
  • Investigate the calibration processes for experiments at ATLAS and CMS during initial collisions
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, LHC researchers, and anyone involved in high-energy physics experiments will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in collider operations and data collection methodologies.

Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
35,014
Reaction score
21,715
The present LHC schedule has first collisions scheduled for Thursday.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A transformer at point 8 failed. No beam until Wednesday. This makes Thursday collisions unlikely.
 
Some questions maybe some of you can answer:
At what energy level and intensity are the first collisions supposed to occur?

At which sites are they going to be recorded first for calibration purposes, or will everyone start taking data all at once?

Are all sites ready?

I assume with all the different experiments set up there must be preference for calibration.
 
The first collisions are at injection energy, 450 GeV on 450 GeV. There will be 2 bunches per beam, with one collision at Point 1 (ATLAS) and another at Point 5 (CMS). Luminosity is anyone's guess - mine is about 10^27 /cm2/s which is about one millionth of design and corresponds to an interaction rate of around 40 Hz.

Within about a month, the hope is that there will be collisions at 5 TeV on 5 TeV at 10^31 or so - about 1% of design. This run's total delivered luminosity is expected to be about 1% of what the Tevatron has collected so far, within maybe a factor of 3 or 4 each way. There will then be a shutdown for several months, and when they come up again in 2009, the hope is that they will be at full energy and will work there way up to design luminosity.
 
Is the schedule posted online anywhere? I searched the LHC website, but couldn't find anything specific.
 
I don't think the entire schedule is posted anywhere. There's the long term plan (months), which is reported to the experiments by CERN management, and there's a short term plan (one or two days) on the LHC operations web site. But to pick a date in October and say that's when there will be collisions is premature: sure, one could pick a date, but depending on experience it will be bound to change.
 
The 450 GeV first collision has been rescheduled for this Sunday.

Zz.
 
Yes i think they continuously proceed with testing. The dates like 10 september or 21 october are just "media-days". I think after their official launch of 10 september, there will be less interest from the media. But indeed, the most interesting moment will be when the first collissions take place. They are very cautious that nothing goes wrong this time ... I wonder what energies will be necessary to desintegrate the protons and when this will happen...
 
Quench in sector 3-4 today. That will delay collisions a few more days minimum.
 
  • #11
It seems that the LHC will down for at least two months,

http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/09/20/hadron.collider.damage.ap/index.html .

Won't this take it into the winter shutdown?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
LHC damaged by black hole. Earth next.

It looks like the Earth has been spared for another 2 weeks.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26802846"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14


George Jones said:
CNN says at least another two months,
I fat fingered the 'weeks' key. This is bad news. It means I'll have to meet my deadlines after all.
 
  • #15


jimmysnyder said:
I fat fingered the 'weeks' key. This is bad news. It means I'll have to meet my deadlines after all.

Er.. you definitely will have to meet your deadline. Even if they get first collision, it is at such a low energy, it is well below those done right now at the Tevatron. No black there yet last time I checked. It will take a while (a long while) before they get to optimum condition.

Zz.
 
  • #16
Well , seems to match the scedule of the maya's too... :smile:
 
  • #17
Here is the official statement:

Robert Aymar said:
Incident in LHC sector 34

Dear Colleagues,
During commissioning (without beam) of the final LHC sector (sector 34) at high current for operation at 5 TeV, an incident occurred at mid-day on Friday 19 September resulting in a large helium leak into the tunnel. Preliminary investigations indicate that the most likely cause of the problem was a faulty electrical connection between two magnets which probably melted at high current leading to mechanical failure. CERN's strict safety regulations ensured that at no time was there any risk to people.

A full investigation is underway, but it is already clear that the sector will have to be warmed up for repairs to take place. This implies a minimum of two months down time for the LHC operation. For the same fault, not uncommon in a normally conducting machine, the repair time would be a matter of days.


Further details will be made available as soon as they are known.

The long-term schedule implications are not obvious - this may actually bring the machine to full energy quicker. If you recall, the reason that the first high energy collisions were to be at 10 TeV rather than 14 TeV was that the magnets needed about two months of additional training. Well, for 7/8 of the ring, a two month window just opened up. It may even by wise to do this now, and try and trigger a similar incident if there are other magnets that may potentially fail in the same way. You'd rather cool down two sectors in parallel instead of one after the other.
 
  • #18
Hi Vanadium,
Vanadium 50 said:
Quench in sector 3-4 today. That will delay collisions a few more days minimum.
Do you know if the quench and the helium leak are related? Do you have any more detail on the helium leak? Sounds like the helium actually came out through the vacuum jacket somehow and got into the tunnel.

Also, do you know if the magnets were ramped up to full field prior to the quench? Seems odd that a magnet would spontaneously quench. Most quenches occur only during ramping.
 
  • #19
The quench occurred during ramping tests to 5 TeV. Obviously for helium to be leaking there was damage to at least one magnet.
 
  • #20
Vanadium 50 said:
Here is the official statement:
...
...
The long-term schedule implications are not obvious...
New official statement just came out (Tuesday)
http://blogs.uslhc.us/?p=388

restart "early spring 2009"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #21
I am curious whether this means the winter upgrades will begin early, as the USLHC writers keep predicting.

On the bright side, the first LHC data will be at full power!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K