Energy spacing in the description of energy bands.

  • Thread starter Thread starter dvurger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
dvurger
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
"The electrons of a single isolated atom occupy atomic orbitals, which form a discrete set of energy levels. If several atoms are brought together into a molecule, their atomic orbitals split, as in a coupled oscillation. This produces a number of molecular orbitals proportional to the number of atoms. When a large number of atoms (of order ×1020 or more) are brought together to form a solid, the number of orbitals becomes exceedingly large. Consequently, the difference in energy between them becomes very small." -Wikipedia on energy bands.

I don't understand that implication between the number of orbitals and the energy spacing converging to 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy splitting induced between two atoms can be thought of as a measure of how strongly those atoms interact. So the stronger the interaction, the bigger the energy splitting.

For two atoms close together, they interact relatively strongly, so the energy splitting is large. But for a big molecule, two atoms at opposite ends of the molecule barely interact at all, so their energy splitting is very small. So as the number of atoms in a system increases, the energy levels get closer together until finally, in an infinite crystal, the energy levels are continuous—that is, infinitely close together.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top