jaydnul
- 558
- 15
But high frequency are absorbed, like gamma rays. I would think it would be the opposite. So what's the physical reason?
The discussion revolves around the physical reasons for the absorption of gamma rays compared to lower frequency electromagnetic (EM) waves. Participants explore the interaction of different frequencies of EM radiation with various materials, questioning the relationship between frequency and absorption or penetration capabilities.
Participants express differing views on the relationship between frequency and absorption, with no consensus reached on the underlying physical reasons for the observed behaviors of gamma rays and other EM waves.
Some claims rely on specific definitions of frequency and material properties, and there are unresolved questions regarding the role of plasma frequency in the behavior of metals with respect to light absorption.
I believe you'll find that gamma rays have higher penetration in, say, steel, than infrared rays.Why is it that lower frequency EM waves are aloud to pass through objects, but high frequency are absorbed, like gamma rays. I would think it would be the opposite. So what's the physical reason?
lundyjb said:But high frequency are absorbed, like gamma rays. I would think it would be the opposite. So what's the physical reason?