Cyclosis in Maxwell's Electromagnetism (Vol.1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter khil_phys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetism
AI Thread Summary
Maxwell introduces the concepts of cyclosis and cyclomatic number in his "Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism (Vol. 1)" to describe the behavior of line integrals and vector potentials within certain geometric configurations. He explains that even when specific mathematical conditions are met, line integrals can yield different results based on the path taken through a region shaped like a ring. This leads to the definition of a diagram formed by connecting points with non-intersecting lines, where the number of independent cycles is calculated using the formula κ = l - p + 1. Cyclosis refers to the existence of these cycles, while the cyclomatic number quantifies them. Understanding these concepts may require familiarity with graph theory, particularly Euler's formula related to planar graphs.
khil_phys
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Cyclosis in Maxwell's "Electromagnetism (Vol.1)"

On page 16, sec. 18 of his "Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism (Vol. 1)", Maxwell introduces the terms cyclosis and cyclomatic number. I cannot visualize the geometry that he describes and so the next few pages are lost on me. Please help me out with this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
The reason that you haven't received any replies is probably because you haven't given us much information. You might also want to show us how Maxwell defines cyclosis and what the relevant definitions and concepts are.
 
Yes, you need to give us more detail, because probably very few people here (if any) have actually read Maxwell's treatise or even have a copy at hand! :bugeye: :eek: :rolleyes:
 
micromass said:
The reason that you haven't received any replies is probably because you haven't given us much information. You might also want to show us how Maxwell defines cyclosis and what the relevant definitions and concepts are.
Okay. Here it is.

Maxwell first defines the basics of line integrals and vector potentials and introduces the del operator. Now, -dψ = Xdx + Ydy + Zdz, where ψ is the vector potential and X, Y and Z are the components of the vector R in the directions of the co-ordinate axes. Now, he writes:

"There are cases, however, in which the conditions \frac{dZ}{dy}=\frac{dY}{dz}, \frac{dX}{dz}=\frac{dZ}{dx}, \frac{dY}{dx}=\frac{dX}{dy}, which are those of Xdx + Ydy + Zdz being a complete differential, are fulfilled throughout a certain region of space, and yet the line-integral from A to P may be different for two lines, each of which lies wholly within that region. This may be the case if the region is in the form of a ring, and if the two lines from A to P pass through opposite segments of the ring. In this case, the one path cannot be transformed into the other by continuous motion without passing out of the region."
...
"Let there be p points in space, and let l lines of any form be drawn joining these points so that no two lines intersect each other, and no point is left isolated. We shall call a figure composed of lines in this way a Diagram. Of these lines, p-1 are sufficient to join the p points so as to form a connected system. Every new line completes a loop or closed path, or, as we shall call it, a Cycle. The number of independent cycles in the diagram is therefore κ = l-p+1."

"Any closed path drawn along the lines of the diagram is composed of these independent cycles, each being taken any number of times and in either direction."

"The existence of cycles is called Cyclosis, and the number of cycles in a diagram is called its Cyclomatic number."
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top