Global warming and CO2 hotspots?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between CO2 emissions from industrial sites and their impact on global warming, specifically questioning the existence of CO2 hotspots and coldspots. It explores whether increased wind speeds around these hotspots are greater than in other areas and examines the potential for a positive feedback cycle involving water vapor and temperature. The conversation references research indicating that while increased temperatures lead to more water vapor, the energy required for evaporation may exceed the energy gained from CO2-induced warming, potentially stabilizing the climate. Additionally, it touches on the role of clouds in reflecting sunlight and regulating temperature. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the complexity of climate dynamics and the need for further investigation into localized effects of CO2 emissions.
battery
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
If CO2 produced by industry is causing global warming then wouldn't there be hotspots above major industrial sites where the CO2 is most concentrated?
And wherever in the world CO2 is washed out of the air by heavy rainfall, shouldn't there be CO2 coldspots too?
If CO2 warming is increasing average wind speeds then are the increases in wind speeds around CO2 hotspots greater than elsewhere?
I read on wikipedia that if the Earth warms up then more water vapour is produced and this in turn leads to more heat being trapped and more water vapour forming and so on.What stops this positive feedback cycle from getting out of control? Do clouds form when the air reaches a certain humidity level and do the clouds then reflect sunlight back into space?
 
Last edited:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
battery said:
If CO2 produced by industry is causing global warming then wouldn't there be hotspots above major industrial sites where the CO2 is most concentrated?
And wherever in the world CO2 is washed out of the air by heavy rainfall, shouldn't there be CO2 coldspots too? If CO2 warming is increasing average wind speeds then are the increases in wind speeds around CO2 hotspots greater than elsewhere?

Jos de Laat has done some research to local effects on industrial areas here:
http://www.knmi.nl/~laatdej/2006joc1292.pdf

I read on wikipedia that if the Earth warms up then more water vapour is produced and this in turn leads to more heat being trapped and more water vapour forming and so on.What stops this positive feedback cycle from getting out of control? Do clouds form when the air reaches a certain humidity level and do the clouds then reflect sunlight back into space?

In the old days, the physics of water vapor was quite different:

Priestley, C.H.B., 1966. The Limitation of Temperature by Evaporation in Hot Climates. Agricultural Meteorology, 3 (1966) 241-246.

From general considerations of energy balance it is argued that one might expect a rather sharply defined upper limit to which screen air temperature will rise above a well-watered underlying surface of sufficient extent. A study of world-wide climatic data supports this view and identifies the limiting temperature as about 92F (+/- 1F). Temperatures over wet terrain within a few degrees of this limit occur widely and frequently.

the logic of which is in the Clausius Clappeyron exponential relationship between temperature and evaporation for a constant relative humidity.

For ballpark figures, from http://www.usclivar.org/Organization/Salinity_WG/workshoppresentations/Evp-salinityLisanYu.pdf let's assume average annual evaporation of a meter per year. That's 2.74 liters (2740 g) per m2 per day or 114 g per hour is 0.032 gram per second. It takes 2500 joule to evaporate one gram of water, so for 0.032 gram that's 79 joule per second per square meter or 79 W/m2

Now to keep relative humidity constant when increasing the ambient temperature of 15 C to 16 C, suppose a dewpoint of about 9 degrees we see http://www.humirel.com/All_about_humidity-calculation2.htm a decrease of 67% to 63%. Obviously we also have to raise the dewpoint one degree to get back to 67% Now the absolute humidity calculated http://www.humirel.com/All_about_humidity-calculation4.htm goes from 9 gram/m3 at a dewpoint of 9 degrees to 9.6 gram/m3 at a dewpoint of 10 degrees, an increase of 7%. To sustain an increase of 7% more water vapor in the atmospere it seems logical that the rate of evaporation also has to increase by 7% as well, which in turn requires 7% more energy. Hence I'd need 7% of 79 W/m2 or 5.5 W/m2 extra to maintain constant relative humidity. However the additional energy associated with doubling CO2 is about 3.4-4.0 W/m2

So it appears that the exponential increase of energy required for evaporation exceeds the increase due the enhanced greenhouse effect, killing the positive feedback.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...
These last days, there is a seemingly endless cluster of rather powerful earthquakes close to the islands of Santorini, Amorgos, Anafi, and Ios. Remember, this is a highly volcanically active region, Santorini especially being famous for the supervolcanic eruption which is conjectured to have led to the decline of the Minoan civilization: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minoan_eruption To grasp the scale of what is happening, between the 26th of January and the 9th of February, 12000...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
184
Views
48K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
34
Views
8K
Replies
46
Views
8K
Back
Top