Smallest Tokamak Reactor Size: Can it be in a Garage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter VelociBlade
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tokamak
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of constructing a small tokamak reactor in a garage or basement. It concludes that while theoretically possible, practical challenges such as extreme magnetic fields, significant power requirements, and radiation hazards make home-built tokamak reactors impractical at this stage. The conversation emphasizes the need for a stable plasma and a reliable fuel feed system, which are currently unresolved issues in fusion technology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic confinement in fusion reactors
  • Knowledge of plasma stability and behavior
  • Familiarity with energy requirements for fusion processes
  • Basic principles of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) and its role in fusion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of magnetic confinement fusion
  • Explore advancements in plasma stability techniques
  • Investigate current fusion reactor designs and their energy requirements
  • Learn about the role of electromagnetic radiation in achieving fusion
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, fusion energy researchers, and hobbyists interested in advanced energy technologies and the challenges of building fusion reactors.

VelociBlade
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
What is the smallest size for a tokamak reactor? I was wondering if it was possible to create it in a garage or basement like a fusor.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
im no physicist, but wouldn't you be able to make a tokamak reactor of any size as long as the containment chamber contains enough hydrogen atoms to fuse together? of course the containment chamber size would need to be proportional to the amount of energy you desire to output. the magnetic fields to achieve fusion would be extreme regardless of size, you would need a serious power source to make even a nominal amount of energy. watch out for the radiation mind you. if magnetic confinement is the only method of compression to reach the required kinetic energy level, that is a serious component of your project. the excitement of the atoms to my knowledge usually incorporates radio waves, and other forms of EMR.
in my mind, making a home-made tokamak reactor is not practical. I applaud your efforts to explore this technology; but it is not yet practical at this level.
there are many many problems with this technology as it exists today, you can only get a burst of fusion because there is no current piratical method to feed your reactor with fuel. it will burn itself out. the problems with creating a stable plasma are not very encouraging either.
Google fusion reactors and the concepts behind them as well as the energy requirements; it will give you an idea of what you are trying to do.
-way to be ambitious!

check out the threads
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=245508
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=208519
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K