Is Set B of Functions from Natural Numbers to {0,1} Countable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AnthonyAcc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Mapping
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the set B, defined as the collection of functions mapping natural numbers to the set {0,1}. Participants are exploring whether this set is countable, particularly in relation to infinite binary sequences and their representation as real numbers in the interval (0,1).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of representing infinite binary sequences as real numbers and question the countability of the set of real numbers in the interval (0,1). There is also a consideration of how changing the range of functions affects the interpretation of countability.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants offering different perspectives on the relationship between binary sequences and real numbers. Some suggest using Cantor's diagonal argument as a fundamental approach to understanding uncountability, while others clarify the implications of notation and mapping.

Contextual Notes

There is an underlying assumption that the participants are familiar with concepts of countability and the Cantor diagonal argument, as well as the implications of mapping functions to different sets.

AnthonyAcc
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Let B={s|s is a function mapping the set of natural numbers to {0,1}}. Is B a countable set-that is, is it possible to find a function \Phi() mapping the set of natural numbers onto B-?


I know that it has to do with infinite binary sequences, but the countability part confuses me. Can someone explain that and give me a first step to answering this?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Every mapping in B is an infinite binary sequence (sequences of 0 and 1), as you say, and so, if we put a "." in front of it, represents a real number, written in base 2, in the interval (0,1). But the set of real numbers in that interval is not countable.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Every mapping in B is an infinite binary sequence (sequences of 0 and 1), as you say, and so, if we put a "." in front of it, represents a real number, written in base 2, in the interval (0,1). But the set of real numbers in that interval is not countable.

That's interesting. Does saying that putting a "." in front of the sequences written in base 2 is in the interval (0,1) mean anything? If the question was if B={s|s is a function mapping the set of natural numbers to {1,2}} putting a period in front of the sequences would make them less than 1 which would make them not in the interval (1,2), but the logic of them being real numbers and that real numbers aren't countable is still solid. Correct?
 
Halls is suggesting a shortcut. No, putting a 'dot' in front really doesn't prove anything unless you understand the shortcut. But you can always use the Cantor diagonal argument directly. I'd suggest you look that up and understand it, since it's fundamental to the proof that there are uncountable sets.
 
My point is this: suppose one such sequence is "11001010010101100...". "Putting a '.' in front of it" means writing .11001010010101100..., a number between 0 and 1, written in binary. Further, any real number, between 0 and 1, is such a sequence so there is a one-to-one correspondence. Every such sequence corresponds to a number between 0 and 1.

You ask about "if B={s|s is a function mapping the set of natural numbers to {1,2}} putting a period in front of the sequences would make them less than 1 which would make them not in the interval (1,2)". Why would you want it in (1, 2)? The notation {1, 2} means every value must be either 1 or 2 and does not have anything to do with the interval (1, 2). Frankly, if I were given the problem of showing that the set of all functions from the natural numbers to {1, 2} were uncountable, I would immediately observe that there is an obvious correspondence between {1, 2} and {0,1} and start talking about binary numerals again!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K