Can a Variac handle the current output of a 2300V microwave oven transformer?

In summary, the conversation discusses using a microwave oven transformer (MOT) to power a Variac and rectify its output with diodes. The MOT has an output of 2300V and a current of 0.52A, while the Variac is 0-140VAC at 6A. The diodes are rated for 9kV and 500mA. There are concerns about safety and whether the current and voltage ratings will remain consistent throughout the range of the MOT and Variac. It is emphasized that MOTs are dangerous and caution must be taken when handling them.
  • #1
axi0m
60
0
If one had a microwave oven transformer (MOT) from a microwave that was said to be 1200W, and the transformer itself had an output of 2300V, would that mean that the current would be:

Power = Current * Voltage

1200W = Current * 2300V

Current = 0.52A

The reason I ask is because: I'm looking to power said MOT by a Variac that is said to be 0-140VAC at 6A. I'm trying to verify that I won't overload the current of the Variac with said MOT.

Also, I'm going to rectify the output of the MOT with a diode bridge consisting of four diodes said to be 9kV and 500mA. I understand that at 9kV and 0.5A, the power would be 4.5kW -- way higher that the output of the MOT. But, does the maximum current of the diodes increase as the voltage decreases? In other words, even though they say 500mA, could they sustain higher current at lower voltages, such as 500V?

I'm sure to many of you these are laughable questions. :shy: Any help, though, would be much appreciated! Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
MOTs are dangerous to play around for reasons stated, 0.5 amps at 2000 volts is lethal.

the primary winding is usually pulsed by DC or the positive side of AC only, and the secondary of many MOTs is tied with magnetic core to serve as a ground, if you feed AC directly to primary then your whole MOT becomes hot, meaning if you touch your transformer you can be killed.

As for current rating on the secondary, check the wire gauge, and look it up in a table.

you can make a nice welder with a MOT, but I strongly advise against using it for high voltage
 
  • #3
Probably the power supply in your microwave oven is the most dangerous item in your house. So, it is probably necessary to warn you of this. Even one such transformer is able and willing to kill you.

Diodes are rated for current according to the heat they can dissipate. High voltage diodes are usually a stack of lower voltage diodes in one package and their dissipation depends on the voltage drop across the diode stack times the current flowing.

It does not depend on the transformer voltage.

Discarded microwaves often have a perfectly good diode in them that is used as a half wave rectifier carrying the full current of the magnetron. These are well worth salvaging if you get the chance.

The current in your calculation would be 1 amp

Power = Current * Voltage

2300W = Current * 2300V

Current = 1 A

However, the primary current would be more like 20 amps (2300 watts / 120 volts) in normal operation so you may find the fuses in your variac blowing if you try to use that sort of power from the transformer.
Also these transformers are relatively low inductance in the primary so they draw a large leakage current even with no load on the secondary.
 
  • #4
Vk6kro, sorry, the 2300W was a typo. I meant 1200W.

Also, just for you guy's reassurance, I won't even think about powering this thing up before I have it all securely fastened into an enclosure, probably made of thick plastic, with only the control knob to the Variac, an I/O switch and a momentary "power/fire" button on the panel of said enclosure. The output of this whole power supply device will be run through 15kV 18AWG wire.

Vk6kro, you said that "Diodes are rated for current according to the heat they can dissipate... and their dissipation depends on the voltage drop across the diode stack times the current flowing... It does not depend on the transformer voltage." But, wouldn't the voltage across the diode depend on the voltage coming out of the MOT?

Just FYI, http://cgi.ebay.com/9KVolt-Microwave-Oven-High-Voltage-Diode-HVR-1X-4_W0QQitemZ140334033651QQcmdZViewItemQQptZAU_Home_Appliances?hash=item20ac8f6af3&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=65%3A15%7C66%3A4%7C39%3A1%7C293%3A1%7C294%3A200#shId" that I'm currently interested in.

So, 1200W/120VAC would give 10A of current in the primary of the MOT (in which case I would find a Variac capable of such a current.) But, would the MOT would pull 1200W of power in its primary through the full range of 0-120VAC as adjustable by the Variac? This concept is what really has me lost/confused. :confused:

Similarly, would the output of the MOT, which depends on the output of the Variac, remain at 1200W through the full range of voltages possible by the MOT's output? For example, if I had the Varaic turned down low, the MOT would consequently output a lower voltage, say, 500V. Would the current that is coming out of the MOT be 1200W/500V = 2.4A? Again, trying to make several well-known equations, which all seem dependant on each other, balance out in my head is very confusing.

Sorry guys, I wish I could be more participative on these forums versus constantly inquisitive. Thanks for your time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
At the risk of repeating other posts, your analysis of the rated current (0.52 A) is correct. (I V = 1200 watts, or more exactly, 1200 volt-amps). This essentially is the current (IR drop) limit of the transformer windings. If you exceed this current, the copper windings overheat.
I believe this transformer is safe to power with your Variac, but you might want to limit the input voltage to 120 volts, because this limits the interturn voltage of the windings, AND limits the peak magnetization of the core. If you go to 140 volts, you may push the magnetic core into saturation. Does the transformer have any other secondaries that may need to be included in the 1200 w (actually volt-amp) rating?

The diodes have two separate ratings: 0.5 amps, and PIV = 9 kV. Do not exceed either.

I know a guy who was knocked unconsious by touching the high voltage in a microwave oven. Be extremely careful, and stand back from your project whenever the transformer is powered. If you have capacitors, be sure they are discharged before touching anything.
 
  • #6
axi0m said:
Vk6kro, sorry, the 2300W was a typo. I meant 1200W.

Also, just for you guy's reassurance, I won't even think about powering this thing up before I have it all securely fastened into an enclosure, probably made of thick plastic, with only the control knob to the Variac, an I/O switch and a momentary "power/fire" button on the panel of said enclosure. The output of this whole power supply device will be run through 15kV 18AWG wire.

Vk6kro, you said that "Diodes are rated for current according to the heat they can dissipate... and their dissipation depends on the voltage drop across the diode stack times the current flowing... It does not depend on the transformer voltage." But, wouldn't the voltage across the diode depend on the voltage coming out of the MOT?

Just FYI, http://cgi.ebay.com/9KVolt-Microwave-Oven-High-Voltage-Diode-HVR-1X-4_W0QQitemZ140334033651QQcmdZViewItemQQptZAU_Home_Appliances?hash=item20ac8f6af3&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=65%3A15%7C66%3A4%7C39%3A1%7C293%3A1%7C294%3A200#shId" that I'm currently interested in.

So, 1200W/120VAC would give 10A of current in the primary of the MOT (in which case I would find a Variac capable of such a current.) But, would the MOT would pull 1200W of power in its primary through the full range of 0-120VAC as adjustable by the Variac? This concept is what really has me lost/confused. :confused:

Similarly, would the output of the MOT, which depends on the output of the Variac, remain at 1200W through the full range of voltages possible by the MOT's output? For example, if I had the Varaic turned down low, the MOT would consequently output a lower voltage, say, 500V. Would the current that is coming out of the MOT be 1200W/500V = 2.4A? Again, trying to make several well-known equations, which all seem dependant on each other, balance out in my head is very confusing.

Sorry guys, I wish I could be more participative on these forums versus constantly inquisitive. Thanks for your time.

We have to give these warnings because there are lots of people reading these wise words and we don't want someone frying themselves! So please excuse the warnings if you already know how dangerous a microwave transformer is.

The 1200 watts is actually the microwave power available for cooking or heating. The actual power the transformer uses is shown on the back of the the oven. It could be something like 2000 watts.

The current a transformer draws on its primary depends on the load on the secondary. If there is no load on the secondary, the primary will not draw much current. BUT it will draw some current. This is called the leakage current.

The diode. This has two problems.
First, it has to stop current flowing in the reverse direction. All diodes do this, but some high voltage ones can stand more reverse voltage than others. This is called the peak inverse voltage of the diode.
Secondly, when the diode is conducting, it has a small voltage across it (usually 0.6 volts, but in this case it will be higher) and a current flowing through it. It is only this small voltage that matters for heating, because when the big voltage occurs, there is no current flowing.
Can you see that these two voltages happen at different times?
Both these ratings are important because diodes can fail if one of them is exceeded.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #7
Bob S said:
I believe this transformer is safe to power with your Variac, but you might want to limit the input voltage to 120 volts, because this limits the interturn voltage of the windings, AND limits the peak magnetization of the core.
So, with the Variac turned up to 120V, wouldn't the primary on the MOT pull significantly more (1200VA/120V=10A) current than the 6A of the Variac?

vk6kro said:
The current a transformer draws on its primary depends on the load on the secondary.
Worst case scenario: the load is a short-circuit (maybe I want to make a couple sparks when I'm not charging caps.) So, would it be advisable to put capacitor or inductor between the Variac and MOT primary to limit current, because based on what you said, a short-circuit would probably instantly blow the Variac's fuse, right?
 
  • #8
So, with the Variac turned up to 120V, wouldn't the primary on the MOT pull significantly more (1200VA/120V=10A) current than the 6A of the Variac?

No. If there is no load on the secondary of the transformer, there won't be much current in the primary. The current might only be an AMP or so.

Worst case scenario: the load is a short-circuit (maybe I want to make a couple sparks when I'm not charging caps.) So, would it be advisable to put capacitor or inductor between the Variac and MOT primary to limit current, because based on what you said, a short-circuit would probably instantly blow the Variac's fuse, right?

Sparking will possibly cause the primary current to go very high and may even melt the fine wire of the secondary. So, yes, you need to limit the current somehow.
 
  • #9
vk6kro said:
No. If there is no load on the secondary of the transformer, there won't be much current in the primary. The current might only be an AMP or so.
Wouldn't the load be, in one scenario, the charging capacitor?
 
  • #10
Yes, but the capacitor is only 1uF in a microwave and charging happens very quickly.
You might see it briefly on a meter when you apply the capacitor, but it would probably happen too quickly to blow the variac fuse.

It might, though, so try it at a lower voltage first.

In fact, I would suggest you never feed more than about 20 volts into the primary. That would still give you 400 volts.
 
  • #11
vk6kro said:
In fact, I would suggest you never feed more than about 20 volts into the primary. That would still give you 400 volts.

I see. That's about all the voltage I'll truly need. But, I'm actually interested in charging a 400VDC 12,000uF capacitor. Considering such a large capacitance, I was just thinking that it would be a high load, hence pulling a high current through the primary of the MOT.
 
  • #12
Yes, it might be a problem. You could limit the current with a 24 volt lamp bulb or two 12 volt ones in series with the primary. Wind the Variac up gradually from zero when you first try it.

Don't leave the charged capacitors around unattended. Use them or discharge them. Even 400 volts is dangerous.

A good advice used to be to keep one hand behind your back so you couldn't get across high voltages.
 
  • #13
If I want to limit the current coming into my circuit to 5A (I do,) I'll need 24Ohms:
120V/24Ohms = 5A​


So to get 24Ohms of inductive reactance, I'll need 0.063 Henries:
24Ohms = 6.28 * 60Hertz * 0.063Henries​
That's 63,000uH of inductance -- seems a little uncommon.


To get 24Ohms of capacitive reactance, I need:
24Ohms = 1 / (6.28 * 60Hertz * 110.58uF​
That's 110.58uF -- seems much more available.

Can most electrolytic capacitors be used for AC as well as DC?
 
  • #14
axi0m said:
That's 63,000uH of inductance -- seems a little uncommon.

68 mH is a standard value. Probaby close enough.


axi0m said:
Can most electrolytic capacitors be used for AC as well as DC?

No, but you can put two in series, with like polarity together. Assuming each has an equal value, C, the resulting capacitance will be C/2.
 
  • #15
negitron said:
68 mH is a standard value. Probaby close enough.
Hmm, after doing some searching, most inductors of this high of an inductance seem really low current. I'd imagine that to get one that is 68mH and can handle 5A would be massive (and expensive.)


negitron said:
No, but you can put two in series, with like polarity together. Assuming each has an equal value, C, the resulting capacitance will be C/2.
On the other hand, however, I found a http://mouser.com/Search/ProductDetail.aspx?qs=sGAEpiMZZMsCnlYck6hSqLhQjFWSHEDhL0WgC2TwEi4%3d" [Broken]. So, I could connect two of those in series with like polarity and use it as a 110uF AC capacitor limiting current to 5A? :-)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
If you want to limit the voltage to 400 volts or so, you can do the calculations with 20 volts as the input.

That means the suggestion above of using 24 volt lamp bulbs would be OK. Probably a lot easier than using reactive limiting. These have the added advantage that you can see if there is current flowing because the lamp will glow.
 
  • #17
vk6kro said:
That means the suggestion above of using 24 volt lamp bulbs would be OK. Probably a lot easier than using reactive limiting. These have the added advantage that you can see if there is current flowing because the lamp will glow.

I see, that's fantastic. So a 24VAC LED lamp would work? So, once I dial the Variac to 24V, would the lamp limit the current to whatever it's rated for, regardless of the load?
 
  • #18
Right. Think of it this way: the absolute maximum current the bulb will draw at a given voltage occurs when the bulb is alone in the circuit; anything you add in series with that can't make it draw more.
 
  • #19
LEDs are not suitable for AC circuits. Use only filament-type lamps. Also, if you use capacitors to limit the AC current, use only motor starting capacitors, preferably ones rated for continuous use. If you put capacitors in series, make sure the two capacitors are equal capacitance. Also put resistors across each capacitor to equalize the voltage drop across each capacitor. It is much better to put AC capacitors with adequate voltage rating in parallel.
 
  • #20
Bob S said:
LEDs are not suitable for AC circuits.

Not true; many of the products our company makes use LEDs as indicators on AC circuits. In addition to the usual current-limiting resistor, if you also add a series diode with a PIV rating greater than the peak voltage of the AC source, your LED will be protected from reverse bias breakdown. This is necessary, since most LEDs have a low PIV on the order of 5 volts or so.

EDIT: And now I see he meant to use the LED lamp as his current-limiter on the MOT circuit. I missed that. As Bob says, that's not going to work at all.
 
  • #21
You need actual filament lamps as used in car brake lights or headlamps.
LED lights are nice, but not suitable for this job.
You can put 12 V lamps in series as long as they are equal wattage ones.
If you need more current, you can parallel up more lamps.

You might be able to find something like a 24 volt 100 watt lamp at a good electrical or hardware store.

There is no chance of blowing up such a lamp if you kept the variac supply to less than 24 volts and it will limit any current to the maximum current the lamp combination will draw on 24 volts.
But since you have a Variac, wind the voltage up slowly and put a meter on your big capacitor to ensure it doesn't get more than 400 volts across it.
 
  • #22
Alright, so the lamp-based current limiting is sounding very appealing. If I were to go the route of capacitive reactance, however, would http://www.alliedelec.com/Search/ProductDetail.aspx?SKU=8520185&MPN=24FD3770-F" be a good option? According to my calculations, that should limit the current going into the Variac to 3.2A. It's 70uF, 370VAC, motor run.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #23
Your 70uF capacitor represents about 38 ohms reactive, which should be OK if it is motor run, and not motor start. Remember that it adds in quadrature to a real load. It could produce a series-resonant circuit with the inductive Variac primary, though. I personally would go for the resistive lamps. Lamp bulbs behave like nonlinear resistors and current limiting devices, because their resistance increases as their current increases.
 
  • #24
Bob S said:
Your 70uF capacitor represents about 38 ohms reactive, which should be OK if it is motor run, and not motor start. Remember that it adds in quadrature to a real load. It could produce a series-resonant circuit with the inductive Variac primary, though. I personally would go for the resistive lamps. Lamp bulbs behave like nonlinear resistors and current limiting devices, because their resistance increases as their current increases.

I had not known of this phenomenon of resonant circuits until your post. I've now researched it a bit; it's an interesting occurance. On a separate note, when designing a railgun, if the current pulse was constructed so that a resonant circuit was created between the inductance of the rails and the capacitance of the capacitor bank, it seems that this could greatly affect system performance, perhaps in a positive manner, as it would reduce system resistance/impedance/etc.
 
  • #25
Resonance is mainly an AC effect although you can get a ringing effect on the edge of square waves due to resonance.

So, you are unlikely to get any benefit from resonance while discharging a capacitor.
In any case, the inductance will be very small and the capacitance very large, so it would even be difficult to observe the resonance under ideal test conditions.
 
  • #26
Sorry to keep an old topic going so long.

http://cgi.ebay.com/Small-Compact-120V-Microwave-High-Voltage-Transformer_W0QQitemZ120417337152QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item1c096ebf40&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14" It's supposed to be "120V 60HZ 2000V 800W 3.29V."

800W / 120V = 6.67A <-- So if this MOT was to be, theoretically, connected directly to line power, it would pull roughly 6.67A in the primary, assuming a full load in the secondary.

One reason I'm asking, is because the Variac I'm looking at has a max current of 7.8A. If the primary of this MOT only pulls 6.67A, I won't need any current limiting at all.

Being that 2000V / 120V = 16.67, could one say that 6.67A / 16.67 would equal 0.4A in the secondary? Thus, giving me about 400mA of charging current.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #27
Remember when we were talking about charging capacitors at 400 volts? It was necessary to limit the current when the capacitors first started to charge. So, you need current limiting.

If you are looking at getting a different transformer, please do not get a microwave oven transformer to develop 400 volts. That is like taking a formula 1 car to do the grocery shopping.
There is an unacceptably high risk that you will get zapped by a microwave oven transformer.

Even a 110 to 220 volt transformer will charge your capacitors to about 310 volts via a bridge rectifier.
 
  • #28
vk6kro said:
Remember when we were talking about charging capacitors at 400 volts? It was necessary to limit the current when the capacitors first started to charge. So, you need current limiting.

If you are looking at getting a different transformer, please do not get a microwave oven transformer to develop 400 volts. That is like taking a formula 1 car to do the grocery shopping.
There is an unacceptably high risk that you will get zapped by a microwave oven transformer.

Even a 110 to 220 volt transformer will charge your capacitors to about 310 volts via a bridge rectifier.

I thought the current limiting was to achieve two purposes, one: limiting voltage to 24, and two: to prevent exceeding the Variac's max current.

As such, If I were to find a MOT that didn't pull more than the max current of the Variac, I wouldn't need to worry about that. Also, being that a Varaic does what it does, I could simply dial that down to 24V to produce the correct output voltage from the MOT. This setup would allow me to make full use of the Variac and MOT for any future projects requiring <2kV, while still giving me a very high charging current.

However, I'm not 100% convinced the MOT is the best option. As you said, through rectification, standard step-up transformers can charge to a significant voltage. I've searched eBay and haven't found one, but do you know where I might find a 110-440V transformer? That would be about perfect.
 
  • #29
The problem with using a variac is that there is a knob there and eventually someone will turn it to see what happens. Death from 2000 volts would be swift but unpleasant.

The current limiting will not stop you applying full voltage to the primary of the transformer.

Valve radios used to have a transformer in them that had a secondary that was 570 volts centre tapped or 285 each side of a centre tap. This was used with a full wave rectifier to produce about 400 volts (actually about 380 V because the valve rectifiers dropped a lot.)

I don't know if there are many of these still in people's garages, but they would be ideal.
 
  • #30
Would it be too difficult of an undertaking to make my own transformer? I'd only need about a 1:3 turn ratio. This would take me from 110 to 330VAC, then rectification should take that to about 470. I've seen some websites that sell cores for homemade transformers, like at the bottom of this site: http://amazing1.com/transformers.htm" [Broken].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #31
axi0m said:
Would it be too difficult of an undertaking to make my own transformer? I'd only need about a 1:3 turn ratio. This would take me from 110 to 330VAC, then rectification should take that to about 470. I've seen some websites that sell cores for homemade transformers, like at the bottom of this site: http://amazing1.com/transformers.htm" [Broken].
Here is a selection of surplus plate transformers for voltages 200V-800V.:
http://www.surplussales.com/transformers/HvLvTr-2.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #32
Good one BobS. That (TP) PWP-52 looks ideal.

Making a transformer from scratch is not a trival matter and you need special insulation layers to complete the job. Those ferrite cores would not be suitable for 50 Hz.
 
  • #33
Awesome find Bob S, thanks!

vk6kro said:
Good one BobS. That (TP) PWP-52 looks ideal.

Making a transformer from scratch is not a trival matter and you need special insulation layers to complete the job. Those ferrite cores would not be suitable for 50 Hz.

I see the TP PWP 52. It looks very suitable. It says output is 550 vct @ 40madc. What is vct? (I've searched unsuccessfully.) Also, the current is specified at 40madc, I'm assuming that is 40 milliamperes, but what is the dc designation for? (I'm assuming it doesn't rectify its output.) It looks much more finished than a MOT! I also like that it's hermetically sealed.


EDIT:
Also, the TP T46309 looks appetizing at 400mA output. Rectified this should be about 476V.

(TP) T46309
Thordarson transformer. Sealed. Top terminals. New!

http://www.surplussales.com/Images/Transformers/HighVoltage/tp-t46309.jpg [Broken]

• Primary: 115 / 230v
• Secondary: 340 vct @ 400 ma
• Dimensions: 3" x 4-5/8" x 4-7/8"H
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
That 550 vct just means there is a center tapping on the 550 volt winding. So it is 275 volts either side of a center tap which you would Earth for a full wave rectifier. This would give about 388 volts after a full wave rectifier (2 diodes) and across a capacitor.

The mA DC rating refers to the DC current out after rectification by a full wave rectifier. The transformer just gives AC.

So, it would probably be OK for charging your 400 volt capacitors.

(A bridge rectifier would give about 777 volts from the same winding but at half the current).
 
  • #35
vk6kro said:
That 550 vct just means there is a center tapping on the 550 volt winding. So it is 275 volts either side of a center tap which you would Earth for a full wave rectifier. This would give about 388 volts after a full wave rectifier (2 diodes) and across a capacitor.

The mA DC rating refers to the DC current out after rectification by a full wave rectifier. The transformer just gives AC.

So, it would probably be OK for charging your 400 volt capacitors.

(A bridge rectifier would give about 777 volts from the same winding but at half the current).

I was under the impression that a bridge rectifier was a way to achieve full-wave rectification with a non-center-tapped transformer. From wikipedia,

"A bridge rectifier provides full-wave rectification from a two-wire AC input, resulting in lower cost and weight as compared to a center-tapped transformer design."

As such, how could the output achieved with the bridge rectifier be different from that achieved by using two diodes with a center-tapped transformer?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
844
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Optics
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top