Can a Variac handle the current output of a 2300V microwave oven transformer?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the compatibility of a Variac with a microwave oven transformer (MOT) rated at 1200W and 2300V. Calculations indicate that the MOT would draw approximately 10A at 120V, exceeding the Variac's 6A rating, which raises concerns about potential overload. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the load on the transformer, noting that without a load, the primary current may only be around 1A. Safety warnings are reiterated, highlighting the lethal risks associated with high voltage and the necessity of proper enclosures and precautions. Overall, the consensus suggests using a lower input voltage to prevent exceeding the Variac's capacity and to ensure safe operation.
  • #31
axi0m said:
Would it be too difficult of an undertaking to make my own transformer? I'd only need about a 1:3 turn ratio. This would take me from 110 to 330VAC, then rectification should take that to about 470. I've seen some websites that sell cores for homemade transformers, like at the bottom of this site: http://amazing1.com/transformers.htm" .
Here is a selection of surplus plate transformers for voltages 200V-800V.:
http://www.surplussales.com/transformers/HvLvTr-2.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Good one BobS. That (TP) PWP-52 looks ideal.

Making a transformer from scratch is not a trival matter and you need special insulation layers to complete the job. Those ferrite cores would not be suitable for 50 Hz.
 
  • #33
Awesome find Bob S, thanks!

vk6kro said:
Good one BobS. That (TP) PWP-52 looks ideal.

Making a transformer from scratch is not a trival matter and you need special insulation layers to complete the job. Those ferrite cores would not be suitable for 50 Hz.

I see the TP PWP 52. It looks very suitable. It says output is 550 vct @ 40madc. What is vct? (I've searched unsuccessfully.) Also, the current is specified at 40madc, I'm assuming that is 40 milliamperes, but what is the dc designation for? (I'm assuming it doesn't rectify its output.) It looks much more finished than a MOT! I also like that it's hermetically sealed.


EDIT:
Also, the TP T46309 looks appetizing at 400mA output. Rectified this should be about 476V.

(TP) T46309
Thordarson transformer. Sealed. Top terminals. New!

http://www.surplussales.com/Images/Transformers/HighVoltage/tp-t46309.jpg

• Primary: 115 / 230v
• Secondary: 340 vct @ 400 ma
• Dimensions: 3" x 4-5/8" x 4-7/8"H
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
That 550 vct just means there is a center tapping on the 550 volt winding. So it is 275 volts either side of a center tap which you would Earth for a full wave rectifier. This would give about 388 volts after a full wave rectifier (2 diodes) and across a capacitor.

The mA DC rating refers to the DC current out after rectification by a full wave rectifier. The transformer just gives AC.

So, it would probably be OK for charging your 400 volt capacitors.

(A bridge rectifier would give about 777 volts from the same winding but at half the current).
 
  • #35
vk6kro said:
That 550 vct just means there is a center tapping on the 550 volt winding. So it is 275 volts either side of a center tap which you would Earth for a full wave rectifier. This would give about 388 volts after a full wave rectifier (2 diodes) and across a capacitor.

The mA DC rating refers to the DC current out after rectification by a full wave rectifier. The transformer just gives AC.

So, it would probably be OK for charging your 400 volt capacitors.

(A bridge rectifier would give about 777 volts from the same winding but at half the current).

I was under the impression that a bridge rectifier was a way to achieve full-wave rectification with a non-center-tapped transformer. From wikipedia,

"A bridge rectifier provides full-wave rectification from a two-wire AC input, resulting in lower cost and weight as compared to a center-tapped transformer design."

As such, how could the output achieved with the bridge rectifier be different from that achieved by using two diodes with a center-tapped transformer?
 
Last edited:
  • #36
These transformers were intended for use before solid state rectifiers became available. So, they used full wave (but not bridge) rectifiers.

Each diode conducts for half a cycle of the input and it gets only half the total secondary voltage. So the peak value of the rectified voltage is 1.414 times half the total secondary voltage.
eg half of 500 volts is 250 volts. 250 volts times 1.414 = 353 volts.
This is the voltage a capacitor would charge up to.

If you used the same secondary but put a bridge rectifier across it, the output would be
500 times 1.414 or 707 volts because the entire 500 volt secondary winding is used for each half cycle.

In this case, bigger isn't better. If you have 400 volt capacitors, 700 volts would destroy them.
 
  • #37
axi0m said:
Awesome find Bob S, thanks! I see the TP PWP 52. It looks very suitable. It says output is 550 vct @ 40madc. What is vct? (I've searched unsuccessfully.) Also, the current is specified at 40madc, I'm assuming that is 40 milliamperes, but what is the dc designation for? (I'm assuming it doesn't rectify its output.) It looks much more finished than a MOT! I also like that it's hermetically sealed.
This thumbnail shows a typical HV vacuum tube rectifier circuit using center-tapped transformer and a 5U4 rectifier tube, used in hi-fi circuits in the 1950's. Note that the tube has a common filament and two plates, thus suitable for use with a center-tapped transformer.
 

Attachments

  • 5U4.jpg
    5U4.jpg
    39.9 KB · Views: 566
  • #38
Ok, I believe I understand it now.

So, the beauty about going with the transformer below would be that I wouldn't need a Variac, being that it's final output voltage would be about 388VDC. At this voltage, the current would be 40mA, right?

(TP) PWP-52
Berkshire Transformer power transformer. Hermetically sealed. Terminals & posts on bottom. NSN: 5950-809-9164.

• Primary: 105 / 115 / 125 vac @ 50/60 Hz
• Secondary: 550 vct @ 40 madc,
32v @ 80 ma, 32v @ 80 ma
• Dimensions: 3" x 3" x 3-3/4"H​



Now, examing this one, doing the full-wave rectification with the center-tap, would give 238VDC at 400mA -- not enough voltage. But, if I did a diode bridge (http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=330341169683&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT" ) directly on the two "outer" terminals, I should get (340 * 1.4), or 476VDC at half the current which would be 200mA, right? Then, I'd have to use a Variac to decrease the input voltage, but the advantage is that it would be capable of much higher current.

(TP) T46309
Thordarson transformer. Sealed. Top terminals. New!

• Primary: 115 / 230v
• Secondary: 340 vct @ 400 ma
• Dimensions: 3" x 4-5/8" x 4-7/8"H​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #39
Yes, that's right.

The current ratings are really for average use over a period of time. For briefly charging a capacitor, you could probably exceed those ratings by 50 to 100 %. The transformers that have other secondary windings are rated assuming those windings are fully loaded as well.

If you had a series resistor of 4000 ohms to the capacitor from a 400 volt supply, you could limit the current at turn-on to 100mA but this would drop rapidly and give a charging time constant of about 40 seconds. So the capacitor would have a charging time of something over a minute.

So, the transformer would be stressed for only the first 10 seconds or so and probably wouldn't heat up at all.

There must be lots of those transformers around. TV sets used to have large heavy transformers in them before they got switch mode power supplies. So, I wouldn't rush into buying a new one off Internet. Ask around at your local junk store.

Also, you can use voltage doublers which would give you about 280 volts from a 100 volt source.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K