Can a Variac handle the current output of a 2300V microwave oven transformer?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the feasibility and safety of using a Variac to power a microwave oven transformer (MOT) rated at 1200W with an output of 2300V. Participants explore the implications of current ratings, voltage adjustments, and the behavior of diodes in this context, touching on both theoretical and practical aspects of high-voltage applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the current output of the MOT as 0.52A based on the power rating and voltage, raising concerns about whether this would overload the Variac rated at 6A.
  • Another participant warns about the dangers of working with MOTs, emphasizing the lethal nature of high voltage and the potential for overheating if the current exceeds the windings' limits.
  • There is a discussion about the current rating of diodes, with one participant questioning whether the maximum current rating could increase at lower voltages, while another clarifies that diode ratings depend on heat dissipation rather than transformer voltage.
  • One participant expresses confusion about whether the MOT would draw 1200W across the full range of voltage settings on the Variac and how this would affect the output current.
  • Another participant reiterates the importance of limiting the input voltage to avoid core saturation and highlights the need for caution when working with high-voltage equipment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the dangers associated with MOTs and the importance of safety precautions. However, there are multiple competing views regarding the behavior of the MOT under varying input voltages and the implications for current output, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the relationship between input voltage, output power, and current draw, particularly in the context of using a Variac. There are also concerns about the ratings and safety of diodes used in conjunction with the MOT.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals working with high-voltage transformers, hobbyists experimenting with microwave oven transformers, and those seeking to understand the safety and operational limits of such devices.

  • #31
axi0m said:
Would it be too difficult of an undertaking to make my own transformer? I'd only need about a 1:3 turn ratio. This would take me from 110 to 330VAC, then rectification should take that to about 470. I've seen some websites that sell cores for homemade transformers, like at the bottom of this site: http://amazing1.com/transformers.htm" .
Here is a selection of surplus plate transformers for voltages 200V-800V.:
http://www.surplussales.com/transformers/HvLvTr-2.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Good one BobS. That (TP) PWP-52 looks ideal.

Making a transformer from scratch is not a trival matter and you need special insulation layers to complete the job. Those ferrite cores would not be suitable for 50 Hz.
 
  • #33
Awesome find Bob S, thanks!

vk6kro said:
Good one BobS. That (TP) PWP-52 looks ideal.

Making a transformer from scratch is not a trival matter and you need special insulation layers to complete the job. Those ferrite cores would not be suitable for 50 Hz.

I see the TP PWP 52. It looks very suitable. It says output is 550 vct @ 40madc. What is vct? (I've searched unsuccessfully.) Also, the current is specified at 40madc, I'm assuming that is 40 milliamperes, but what is the dc designation for? (I'm assuming it doesn't rectify its output.) It looks much more finished than a MOT! I also like that it's hermetically sealed.


EDIT:
Also, the TP T46309 looks appetizing at 400mA output. Rectified this should be about 476V.

(TP) T46309
Thordarson transformer. Sealed. Top terminals. New!

http://www.surplussales.com/Images/Transformers/HighVoltage/tp-t46309.jpg

• Primary: 115 / 230v
• Secondary: 340 vct @ 400 ma
• Dimensions: 3" x 4-5/8" x 4-7/8"H
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
That 550 vct just means there is a center tapping on the 550 volt winding. So it is 275 volts either side of a center tap which you would Earth for a full wave rectifier. This would give about 388 volts after a full wave rectifier (2 diodes) and across a capacitor.

The mA DC rating refers to the DC current out after rectification by a full wave rectifier. The transformer just gives AC.

So, it would probably be OK for charging your 400 volt capacitors.

(A bridge rectifier would give about 777 volts from the same winding but at half the current).
 
  • #35
vk6kro said:
That 550 vct just means there is a center tapping on the 550 volt winding. So it is 275 volts either side of a center tap which you would Earth for a full wave rectifier. This would give about 388 volts after a full wave rectifier (2 diodes) and across a capacitor.

The mA DC rating refers to the DC current out after rectification by a full wave rectifier. The transformer just gives AC.

So, it would probably be OK for charging your 400 volt capacitors.

(A bridge rectifier would give about 777 volts from the same winding but at half the current).

I was under the impression that a bridge rectifier was a way to achieve full-wave rectification with a non-center-tapped transformer. From wikipedia,

"A bridge rectifier provides full-wave rectification from a two-wire AC input, resulting in lower cost and weight as compared to a center-tapped transformer design."

As such, how could the output achieved with the bridge rectifier be different from that achieved by using two diodes with a center-tapped transformer?
 
Last edited:
  • #36
These transformers were intended for use before solid state rectifiers became available. So, they used full wave (but not bridge) rectifiers.

Each diode conducts for half a cycle of the input and it gets only half the total secondary voltage. So the peak value of the rectified voltage is 1.414 times half the total secondary voltage.
eg half of 500 volts is 250 volts. 250 volts times 1.414 = 353 volts.
This is the voltage a capacitor would charge up to.

If you used the same secondary but put a bridge rectifier across it, the output would be
500 times 1.414 or 707 volts because the entire 500 volt secondary winding is used for each half cycle.

In this case, bigger isn't better. If you have 400 volt capacitors, 700 volts would destroy them.
 
  • #37
axi0m said:
Awesome find Bob S, thanks! I see the TP PWP 52. It looks very suitable. It says output is 550 vct @ 40madc. What is vct? (I've searched unsuccessfully.) Also, the current is specified at 40madc, I'm assuming that is 40 milliamperes, but what is the dc designation for? (I'm assuming it doesn't rectify its output.) It looks much more finished than a MOT! I also like that it's hermetically sealed.
This thumbnail shows a typical HV vacuum tube rectifier circuit using center-tapped transformer and a 5U4 rectifier tube, used in hi-fi circuits in the 1950's. Note that the tube has a common filament and two plates, thus suitable for use with a center-tapped transformer.
 

Attachments

  • 5U4.jpg
    5U4.jpg
    39.9 KB · Views: 572
  • #38
Ok, I believe I understand it now.

So, the beauty about going with the transformer below would be that I wouldn't need a Variac, being that it's final output voltage would be about 388VDC. At this voltage, the current would be 40mA, right?

(TP) PWP-52
Berkshire Transformer power transformer. Hermetically sealed. Terminals & posts on bottom. NSN: 5950-809-9164.

• Primary: 105 / 115 / 125 vac @ 50/60 Hz
• Secondary: 550 vct @ 40 madc,
32v @ 80 ma, 32v @ 80 ma
• Dimensions: 3" x 3" x 3-3/4"H​



Now, examing this one, doing the full-wave rectification with the center-tap, would give 238VDC at 400mA -- not enough voltage. But, if I did a diode bridge (http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=330341169683&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT" ) directly on the two "outer" terminals, I should get (340 * 1.4), or 476VDC at half the current which would be 200mA, right? Then, I'd have to use a Variac to decrease the input voltage, but the advantage is that it would be capable of much higher current.

(TP) T46309
Thordarson transformer. Sealed. Top terminals. New!

• Primary: 115 / 230v
• Secondary: 340 vct @ 400 ma
• Dimensions: 3" x 4-5/8" x 4-7/8"H​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #39
Yes, that's right.

The current ratings are really for average use over a period of time. For briefly charging a capacitor, you could probably exceed those ratings by 50 to 100 %. The transformers that have other secondary windings are rated assuming those windings are fully loaded as well.

If you had a series resistor of 4000 ohms to the capacitor from a 400 volt supply, you could limit the current at turn-on to 100mA but this would drop rapidly and give a charging time constant of about 40 seconds. So the capacitor would have a charging time of something over a minute.

So, the transformer would be stressed for only the first 10 seconds or so and probably wouldn't heat up at all.

There must be lots of those transformers around. TV sets used to have large heavy transformers in them before they got switch mode power supplies. So, I wouldn't rush into buying a new one off Internet. Ask around at your local junk store.

Also, you can use voltage doublers which would give you about 280 volts from a 100 volt source.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K