Quick question about positive beta decay and mass defect?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on positive beta decay in nuclear physics, specifically the confusion surrounding the energy release equation Q = [M(A,Z) - M(A,Z-1) - 2me]c². Participants clarify that the factor of two arises from the inclusion of the mass of two electrons in the atomic mass calculations, as atomic masses account for the electrons present in neutral atoms. The justification for using atomic mass instead of nuclear mass is due to practical measurement constraints, as mass spectrometers typically measure atomic masses. This understanding resolves the confusion regarding the excess electron mass-energy in the decay process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear physics concepts, particularly beta decay
  • Familiarity with mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²)
  • Knowledge of atomic mass versus nuclear mass
  • Basic principles of particle physics, including positrons and neutrinos
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of mass defect in nuclear reactions
  • Study the differences between atomic mass and nuclear mass in detail
  • Explore the role of mass spectrometry in measuring atomic masses
  • Learn about the conservation laws in particle decay processes
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear physicists, students studying particle physics, and anyone interested in the intricacies of beta decay and mass-energy relationships in atomic structures.

jeebs
Messages
314
Reaction score
5
Hi,
I was wondering about something in my notes that I don't quite understand. In positive beta decay in nuclear physics, we have a proton becoming a neutron and kicking out a positron and an electron neutrino (which is assumed massless here).

In the expression for the energy released, Q = [M(A,Z) - M(A,Z-1) - 2me]c2, we have the kinetic energy of the products is equal to the mass-energy of the original nucleus minus the mass energy of the new nucleus minus TWO electron masses.
This factor of two is what confuses me.

All my notes really say is that this is due to an excess of electrons. Now I assume what this means is that originally the atom is electrically neutral, with equal numbers of protons and electrons. After this decay, we are one proton short, so there is on excessive electron in an atomic electron shell.

I still do not see where this extra electron mass-energy comes from though, because the excess electron in question is not being created, it was always there. All that has been created is one positron, and we are assuming the neutrino to be massless.

Can anyone explain this?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If we were to use nuclear masses in the calculation, there would be no factor of 2:

Q = M_{nuc}(A,Z) - M_{nuc}(A,Z-1) - m_e

However, the masses that we actually find in the standard tables are atomic masses of neutral atoms, which include the mass of Z electrons: M(A,Z) = M_{nuc}(A,Z) + Zm_e. Substituting for the nuclear masses in the first equation:

Q = [M(A,Z) - Zm_e] - [M(A,Z-1) - (Z-1)m_e] - m_e

Remove the brackets and parentheses, collect terms, and you end up with your equation with the "extra" factor of 2.
 
ah cheers for that jtbell.

can I ask what the justification is for using the atomic mass? its just that the title of my module is "nuclear physics" after all.
 
Probably because what we measure in mass spectrometers etc. is the atomic mass, or something close to it, e.g. a singly-charged ion. It's kind of hard to strip all the electrons off, say, an iron or a uranium atom.
 
I am as confused as the thread starter =)

I get that the M(A,Z) - M(A,Z-1) - 2Me is from the atomic mass..

I just don't know how to relate these graphically..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K