How can a true elasic collision exist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daveman20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
AI Thread Summary
True elastic collisions, where no energy is lost, are primarily observed at the microscopic level, such as with gas atoms, while macroscopic objects like balls cannot achieve this due to thermodynamic properties that produce heat and increase disorder during deformation. The analogy of two wine glasses chiming together is misleading, as any audible collision indicates inelasticity. At the microscopic scale, particles obey conservation laws without energy loss, but when collisions involve larger objects, energy is dissipated as heat. Therefore, while elastic collisions are a useful concept in physics, they are not fully realized in everyday macroscopic interactions. Understanding these distinctions clarifies the nature of collisions across different scales.
Daveman20
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Is this something I just have to accept? How can there be no loss of energy/heat when I've always been taught otherwise. I imagine an elastic collision to be like the electromagnetic force field around an atom that just chimes when it hits another spherical force field around a different atom, like two wine glasses bumping together. Is this a good way to imagine it? Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There can't (although something like steel balls at normal lab speeds are pretty close)
It's just one of those things like massless springs and friction free slopes that make it possible to see the main points
 
mgb_phys said:
There can't (although something like steel balls at normal lab speeds are pretty close)
It's just one of those things like massless springs and friction free slopes that make it possible to see the main points

Thank you, mgb, my intuition remains undefeated! Wikipedia almost had me convinced otherwise.
 
Daveman20 said:
I imagine an elastic collision to be like the electromagnetic force field around an atom that just chimes when it hits another spherical force field around a different atom, like two wine glasses bumping together.
If you can hear the collision, it is inelastic.

Bob S
 
Microscopic particles like gas atoms collide elastically.If the energy of collision becomes equal to or greater than an excitation or ionisation energy the collisions can become inelastic.
 
Microscopic particles (like atoms or electrons) can easily collide elastically. This is a well known type of collision in nuclear physics. This is just a reflection that the particles must obey conservation of momentum and energy directly, with no "coefficient of restitution" or anything like that.

If you're talking about macroscopic objects like balls, then elasticity is a thermodynamic property. In other words, any time you cause deformation in a macroscopic material, you have some kind of thermodynamic material property which causes a correlated production of heat and increases disorder among the molecules in the material. These byproducts like heat take away energy from the momentum. So, along these lines, you never have true elasticity in macroscopic objects.
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top