Finding Fluid Force on Plate Submerged in Fluid

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the fluid force on a submerged plate with a weight density of 62.4 lb/ft³. The correct integral setup for this problem is identified as integrating the expression (5-y)(7-(7/4)y) dy from 0 to 4. Participants clarified that the initial setup included an incorrect term, and the correct width of the triangle at height y is derived from similar triangles, leading to the expression x = (7/4)(4-y). This ensures accurate calculation of the fluid force acting on the submerged plate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid mechanics principles
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in calculus
  • Familiarity with similar triangles and geometric relationships
  • Basic concepts of weight density and its application in fluid force calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of fluid force equations in submerged surfaces
  • Learn advanced integration techniques for complex shapes
  • Explore applications of similar triangles in fluid mechanics
  • Investigate the effects of varying weight densities on fluid force calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those specializing in fluid mechanics, as well as anyone involved in calculating forces on submerged structures.

think4432
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
2. A plate shaped as in the figure [picture.jpg is attached] is submerged vertically in a fluid as indicted. Find the fluid force on the plate if the fluid has weight density 62.4 lb/ft^3

The integral I set up was the limits being -5 to -1 and the integral being (5-y)(-7/4y - 7/4) dy.


[Also on this one I was getting help on it yesterday on another thread...but the tutor seems to offline right now, and I am hoping someone else can assist me to get this problem done]

I was told that the (-7/4y - 7/4) is correct but the (5-y) is not.

After many posts on the last thread I still can't figure out the depth.

Help?
 

Attachments

  • Picture.jpg
    Picture.jpg
    7.3 KB · Views: 490
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, it is the other say around- the "5- y" is correct, it is the "(7/4)- (7/4)y" that is incorrect. You want (7/4)(4- y)= 7- (7/4)y.

Let "y" be the height above the base line of the triangle. Then the depth of water above that line is 5- x. Also, by "similar triangles" we have
\frac{x}{7}= \frac{4-y}{4}
where "x" is the width of the triangle at height y.
(The triangle above height y has height 4- y, width x and is similar to the entire triangle with height 4 and width 7)
x= \frac{7}{4}(4- y)= 7- (7/4)y

So a thin rectangle, at height y, with thickness dy, would have area (7- (7/4)y)dx. Taking \delta as the density of water, the weight of water above that rectangle is the area times the height above y (the volume of water above that rectangle) times the density of water: ((7-(7/4)y)dx)(5- y)\delta

Integrate that from y= 0 to y= 4.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Actually, it is the other say around- the "5- y" is correct, it is the "(7/4)- (7/4)y" that is incorrect. You want (7/4)(4- y)= 7- (7/4)y.

Let "y" be the height above the base line of the triangle. Then the depth of water above that line is 5- x. Also, by "similar triangles" we have
\frac{x}{7}= \frac{4-y}{4}
where "x" is the width of the triangle at height y.
(The triangle above height y has height 4- y, width x and is similar to the entire triangle with height 4 and width 7)
x= \frac{7}{4}(4- y)= 7- (7/4)y

So a thin rectangle, at height y, with thickness dy, would have area (7- (7/4)y)dx. Taking \delta as the density of water, the weight of water above that rectangle is the area times the height above y (the volume of water above that rectangle) times the density of water: ((7-(7/4)y)dx)(5- y)\delta

Integrate that from y= 0 to y= 4.

So wait, What is it that I am integrating? (5-y)(7-7/4y) dy

From the limits [0,4]

?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
756
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K