What are the potential applications of pseudo-magnetism in strained graphene?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sanman
  • Start date Start date
sanman
Messages
737
Reaction score
24
I was reading about how strained graphene can cause electrons to act as if they were in a magnetic field, exhibiting pseudo-magnetic behavior on the order of hundreds of tesla:

http://www.rdmag.com/News/2010/07/Materials-Magnetism-Graphene-under-strain-creates-gigantic-pseudo-magn/

If electrons can be bunched up so tightly as a result of this, then what possible applications could arise from this? I was wondering if the tight bunching of electrons could perhaps serve as a neutron radiation shield, interacting with the neutron's small magnetic moment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_magnetic_moment
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
sanman said:
If electrons can be bunched up so tightly as a result of this, then what possible applications could arise from this? I was wondering if the tight bunching of electrons could perhaps serve as a neutron radiation shield, interacting with the neutron's small magnetic moment.

There's no actual magnetic field being created here. They won't interact with neutrons significantly more than electrons do ordinarily, which is to say very little. And even then, it'd only be neutron scattering, not absorption.

The electronic density is not so high in absolute terms; you'd have significantly higher electron densities around the core of any heavy atom. Nor is the effect really that huge in itself; it's just that a moderate shift in electronic levels corresponds to a huge field if you view it as a Zeeman effect, since the magnetic moment of electrons is so small. Or to put it another way: Magnetic fields have little or no effect on chemistry. (hence NMR/MRI machines)

As it happens, neutron bombardment of graphite (a neutron moderator) causes lattice distortions in itself, known as the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner_effect" . Which is pretty well-studied. It was the indirect cause of the Windscale disaster.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top