An Easy Metric for Einstein Field Equations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on simplifying the process of solving the Einstein Field Equations, particularly for wormhole metrics. Participants recommend starting with the spherically symmetric metric leading to the Schwarzschild solution and the axi-symmetric metric leading to the Weyl solution. The use of computer algebra systems like Maxima and ctensor is emphasized for handling complex calculations involving Christoffel Symbols, Riemann Tensors, and Ricci Scalars. Additionally, the importance of understanding the derivations manually to recognize patterns is highlighted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein Field Equations
  • Familiarity with Christoffel Symbols and Riemann Tensors
  • Basic knowledge of Ricci Scalars and Einstein Tensor
  • Experience with computer algebra systems, specifically Maxima and ctensor
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Schwarzschild solution and its derivation
  • Explore the Weyl solution and its applications
  • Learn to use Maxima for symbolic mathematics
  • Study the Robertson-Walker metric and its implications in cosmology
USEFUL FOR

Engineering graduates, physics students, and researchers in general relativity seeking to simplify their approach to solving Einstein Field Equations and enhance their computational skills.

edgepflow
Messages
688
Reaction score
1
So I am an engineering graduate trying to teach myself some general relativity.

I have tried to solve the Einstein Field equations for a wormhole metric and some others.

After pages and pages of calculating Christoffel Symbols, Riemann Tensors, Ricci Tensors and Scalars, and so on, I end up with a mess that is not correct.

Is there a simple metric(s) I could start with that is less messy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
edgepflow said:
So I am an engineering graduate trying to teach myself some general relativity.

I have tried to solve the Einstein Field equations for a wormhole metric and some others.

After pages and pages of calculating Christoffel Symbols, Riemann Tensors, Ricci Tensors and Scalars, and so on, I end up with a mess that is not correct.

Is there a simple metric(s) I could start with that is less messy?

One of the easiest metrics to begin with is the spherically symmetric metric that leads to the Schwarzschild solution. Another relatively easy metric, but not quite as easy algebraically is the axi-symmetric metric that leads to the Weyl solution. As the previous post indicates, using computer algebra programs is a nice way to go. However, my experience is that there is some benefit to doing a few derivations out the long hard way. What you can learn is to see patterns in the symbols that allow cancellations and subsequently neat, pretty equations. I don't know if computer algebra programs are as adept at this as the human mind. Of course, I may be a little old fashioned that way... :).

Allan
 
Thank you for the posts.

I downloaded the links. I have heard of GRTensor for mathmaticia. Is there anything like this available for MathCAD?

Please help me check that I have some basics straight.

For a coordinate basis (t,u,v,w), the Ricci Scalar is:

R = g^tt Rtt + g^uu Ruu + g^vv Rvv + g^ww R ww

The Einstein Tensor is:

Gtt = Rtt - (1/2) R gtt
Guu = Ruu - (1/2) R guu
Gvv = Rvv - (1/2) R gvv
Gww = Rww - (1/2) R gww

With no other terms included in each term.

The Field equations are now:

Gtt = 8 Pi G Ttt
Guu = 8 Pi G Tuu
Gvv = 8 Pi G Tvv
Gww = 8 Pi G Tww

With no other terms for each coordinate.

Let me know if I have these basics straight.
 
Those equations look right for an orthogonal metric.

If you want to work out an earsy example by hand, try this

<br /> ds^2=-dt^2+a(t)(dx^2+dy^2+dz^2)<br />

0&lt;t&lt;\infty,\ \ \ -\infty&lt;x,y,z&lt;\infty<br />

which is a variant of the Robertson-Walker metric.

The Christoffel symbols are

<br /> {\Gamma^t}_{xx}={\Gamma^t}_{yy}={\Gamma^t}_{zz}= \frac{\dot{a}}{2},\ \ \ {\Gamma^t}_{tx}={\Gamma^t}_{ty}={\Gamma^t}_{tz}= \frac{\dot{a}}{2a}<br />

The Einstein tensor components are

<br /> G_{tt}=\frac{3\,{\left( \dot{a}\right) }^{2}}{4\,{a}^{2}},\ \ \ G_{xx}=G_{yy}=G_{zz}= \frac{\left( \dot{a}\right) ^{2}-4a\ddot{a}}{4a}<br />

You should get some symbolic math program to do this for you - I can recommend Maxima if you don't have Maple or Mathematica.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 186 ·
7
Replies
186
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
970
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K