An Easy Metric for Einstein Field Equations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding simpler metrics for solving the Einstein Field equations, particularly in the context of general relativity. Participants explore various approaches, tools, and examples relevant to this topic, including specific metrics and computational aids.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses frustration with the complexity of calculating Christoffel Symbols and other tensors for wormhole metrics and seeks simpler alternatives.
  • Another participant suggests using Maxima and ctensor as helpful tools for handling the calculations involved in general relativity.
  • A different participant proposes starting with the spherically symmetric metric leading to the Schwarzschild solution as a simpler option, and mentions the axi-symmetric metric leading to the Weyl solution as another possibility.
  • One participant emphasizes the value of deriving equations manually to recognize patterns, despite the availability of computer algebra programs.
  • A participant checks their understanding of the Ricci Scalar and Einstein Tensor equations, seeking confirmation on their correctness.
  • Another participant confirms the equations for an orthogonal metric and suggests a specific example using a variant of the Robertson-Walker metric, providing details on the Christoffel symbols and Einstein tensor components.
  • There is a recommendation for using symbolic math programs to assist with calculations, with Maxima being highlighted as a useful option.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple approaches and suggestions without reaching a consensus on a single method or metric. The discussion includes varying opinions on the use of computational tools versus manual derivation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the completeness of their understanding of the equations and the implications of their calculations. There are also references to specific software tools that may have varying capabilities.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in general relativity, particularly those seeking to understand or simplify the process of solving the Einstein Field equations, may find this discussion beneficial.

edgepflow
Messages
688
Reaction score
1
So I am an engineering graduate trying to teach myself some general relativity.

I have tried to solve the Einstein Field equations for a wormhole metric and some others.

After pages and pages of calculating Christoffel Symbols, Riemann Tensors, Ricci Tensors and Scalars, and so on, I end up with a mess that is not correct.

Is there a simple metric(s) I could start with that is less messy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
edgepflow said:
So I am an engineering graduate trying to teach myself some general relativity.

I have tried to solve the Einstein Field equations for a wormhole metric and some others.

After pages and pages of calculating Christoffel Symbols, Riemann Tensors, Ricci Tensors and Scalars, and so on, I end up with a mess that is not correct.

Is there a simple metric(s) I could start with that is less messy?

One of the easiest metrics to begin with is the spherically symmetric metric that leads to the Schwarzschild solution. Another relatively easy metric, but not quite as easy algebraically is the axi-symmetric metric that leads to the Weyl solution. As the previous post indicates, using computer algebra programs is a nice way to go. However, my experience is that there is some benefit to doing a few derivations out the long hard way. What you can learn is to see patterns in the symbols that allow cancellations and subsequently neat, pretty equations. I don't know if computer algebra programs are as adept at this as the human mind. Of course, I may be a little old fashioned that way... :).

Allan
 
Thank you for the posts.

I downloaded the links. I have heard of GRTensor for mathmaticia. Is there anything like this available for MathCAD?

Please help me check that I have some basics straight.

For a coordinate basis (t,u,v,w), the Ricci Scalar is:

R = g^tt Rtt + g^uu Ruu + g^vv Rvv + g^ww R ww

The Einstein Tensor is:

Gtt = Rtt - (1/2) R gtt
Guu = Ruu - (1/2) R guu
Gvv = Rvv - (1/2) R gvv
Gww = Rww - (1/2) R gww

With no other terms included in each term.

The Field equations are now:

Gtt = 8 Pi G Ttt
Guu = 8 Pi G Tuu
Gvv = 8 Pi G Tvv
Gww = 8 Pi G Tww

With no other terms for each coordinate.

Let me know if I have these basics straight.
 
Those equations look right for an orthogonal metric.

If you want to work out an earsy example by hand, try this

<br /> ds^2=-dt^2+a(t)(dx^2+dy^2+dz^2)<br />

0&lt;t&lt;\infty,\ \ \ -\infty&lt;x,y,z&lt;\infty<br />

which is a variant of the Robertson-Walker metric.

The Christoffel symbols are

<br /> {\Gamma^t}_{xx}={\Gamma^t}_{yy}={\Gamma^t}_{zz}= \frac{\dot{a}}{2},\ \ \ {\Gamma^t}_{tx}={\Gamma^t}_{ty}={\Gamma^t}_{tz}= \frac{\dot{a}}{2a}<br />

The Einstein tensor components are

<br /> G_{tt}=\frac{3\,{\left( \dot{a}\right) }^{2}}{4\,{a}^{2}},\ \ \ G_{xx}=G_{yy}=G_{zz}= \frac{\left( \dot{a}\right) ^{2}-4a\ddot{a}}{4a}<br />

You should get some symbolic math program to do this for you - I can recommend Maxima if you don't have Maple or Mathematica.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 186 ·
7
Replies
186
Views
13K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K