Impact Force (helmets) Safety Devices

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the mechanics of impact force in helmets, specifically comparing soft and hard interiors. A helmet with a soft interior reduces impact force by increasing the time it takes for the head to stop, which lowers the average force experienced during a collision. This relationship is explained through the impulse-momentum theorem, where the change in momentum remains constant, and a longer impact duration results in reduced force. In contrast, a hard interior helmet does not absorb energy as effectively, leading to a quicker stop and higher force on the head. Overall, soft padding enhances safety by prolonging the impact duration and decreasing the force experienced.
Shane-O
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a physics assignment on safety devices such as helmets and i need help with a question.

Why is the Impact force reduced for a helmet with a soft interior VS a hard interior?

I know it is because the soft padding on the inside of soft the helmet will reduce the time taken for your head to stop therefore decreasing the force inflicted on your head but I cannot find a real solid answer about how this can relate to the Hard interior helmet.
Any Help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Want you want to consider is the impulse of the collision, since we know that F = \frac{\Delta P}{\Delta T} then rearranging we obtain F \Delta T = \Delta P and this is what we call the impulse. So from this we can see that since, when something hits you, that object will have the same change in momentum regardless of what type of hat you are wearing (from its velocity to 0) the \Delta P stays constant; what the padding does is increase the time the impact takes (think of punching a pillow where your hand sinks in verses a wall where your hand bounces off in much less time), and since \Delta P is constant an increase in \Delta T will cause a decrease in F. This F is the average force felt so the soft padding will lead to a lower average force but over a longer time.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top