Calculating the Height of a Flowerpot in Free Fall: A Kinematics Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter murphy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around solving a kinematics problem involving a flowerpot in free fall, observed by a cat. The pot is visible for 0.50 seconds as it travels 2.00 meters past a window, and the goal is to determine how high it ascends above the window. It is established that the pot's trajectory is symmetrical, taking 0.25 seconds to rise and 0.25 seconds to fall, confirming that the time to ascend equals the time to descend. Participants emphasize the importance of using the falling body equations to simplify calculations. The final answer for the height above the window is determined to be 2.34 meters.
murphy
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
The Drowsy Cat - Kinematics!

Can anybody help me get started? I have been working on this problem forever...
A drowsy cat spots a flowerpot that sails first up and then down past an open window. The pot is in view for a total of 0.50s and the top to bottom height of the window is 2.00m. How high above the window does the flowerpot go? The answer is 2.34m but I don't know how to get it, I know that it is a kinematics free fall question but I keep getting too many variables. If anyone knows how to go about answering this, that would be awesome! Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The pot's arc will be symmetrical, that means it will take exactly half the time (0.25 seconds) to travel upwards the 2m. (The second half of the pot's trajectory is irrelevant.) Does that simplify things?
 
Yes! Thank you very much. So in these problems, then, can you always assume that the time to go up = the time to come back down? (assuming an ideal free fall situation)
 
For an object thrown from the ground, its velocity on the way down will be equal in magnitude but opposite in direction then at the same height on the way up. So yes it will take the same amount of time to pass the window going going up as going down.

If you set up the falling body equation of motion with t=0 and x=0 at the bottom of the window it works out nicly.
 
My stars & garters - I helped someone! :-)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top