Varification needed for small trigonometrical Fourier series, PRESSING

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the verification of a small trigonometric Fourier series for the function x(t) = 1/2 + cos(t) + cos(2t). Participants explore the calculation of Fourier coefficients, particularly the an terms, and address potential errors in integration.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that x(t) is an even function, leading to the conclusion that all bn terms are zero.
  • Another participant claims that the calculation of an terms results in an = 0, which aligns with their earlier findings.
  • A different participant suggests that there may be a mistake in the formula used for calculating the an terms, proposing a specific integration method to verify the coefficients.
  • Some participants reference a related problem and indicate that they have sought further assistance in a different forum section.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the calculation of the an terms, as one participant asserts they are zero while another suggests a potential error in the calculations leading to a different expected result. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct interpretation of the Fourier coefficients.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the integration process and the application of the Fourier series formula, indicating a need for careful verification of the calculations involved.

toneboy1
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have x(t) = 1/2 + cos(t) + cos(2t)

so I can see that a0 = 1/2
and that it is an even function so there is no bn
Also that T = 2pi so
an = 2/2pi ∫02pi x(t).cos(nω0t) dt

but when I integrate this I get an = 0 yet I've been told that the answer is

x(t) = 1/2 + Ʃn = 12 cos(nω0t)

which would mean that an = 1, but I'm not sure how.

Anyone?

Thanks heaps!EDIT: I just found another related problem I'm struggling with if anyone's interested:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=654607
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
This has been adequately addressed already. Your x(t) is already a Fourier series. If you computed the coefficients to be different you made a math error.
 


Hello,

Thank you for sharing your question and concern about verification for small trigonometrical Fourier series. It seems like you have correctly identified that x(t) is an even function, which means that all the bn terms will be equal to zero. However, the issue you are facing is with calculating the an terms.

In order to verify the small trigonometrical Fourier series, you will need to use the formula for calculating the an terms:

an = 2/T ∫0T x(t).cos(nω0t) dt

In your case, T = 2π and ω0 = 1, so the formula becomes:

an = 2/2π ∫0 2π [1/2 + cos(t) + cos(2t)].cos(nt) dt

Now, when you integrate this, you will get:

an = 1/π [sin(nt) + 1/2 sin(t) + 1/4 sin(2t)] evaluated from 0 to 2π

Since the sine function is periodic with a period of 2π, sin(nt) evaluated at 2π will be equal to sin(0) = 0. Similarly, sin(2t) evaluated at 2π will also be equal to sin(0) = 0. This leaves us with:

an = 1/π [1/2 sin(t)] evaluated from 0 to 2π

Using the fact that sin(t) is also an odd function, we know that sin(t) evaluated at 0 will be equal to 0 and sin(t) evaluated at 2π will also be equal to 0. Therefore, the an terms will be equal to 0, which is the same result you got.

However, when you use the formula for the Fourier series, you will get:

x(t) = 1/2 + Ʃn = 1^2 cos(nω0t) = 1/2 + cos(t) + cos(2t)

So, there must be a mistake in the formula you were using to calculate the an terms. I suggest double-checking the formula and making sure you are using the correct values for T and ω0.

As for the related problem you mentioned, I recommend posting it on a physics forum or discussing it with a colleague or mentor who has experience with Fourier series. They may be able to
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K