Variance of Geometric Brownian motion?

AI Thread Summary
Geometric Brownian motion is described by the equation dX = μX dt + σX dB, leading to the transformation ln X = (μ - σ²/2)t + σB. The discussion focuses on deriving the variance of ln X, with attempts suggesting Var(ln X) = σ²t. The conclusion indicates that X follows a log-normal distribution, with the probability density function provided. Clarification is sought on the derivation process and any potential errors in reasoning.
saminator910
Messages
95
Reaction score
2
I am trying to derive the Probability distribution of Geometric Brownian motion, and I don't know how to find the variance.

start with geometric brownian motion

dX=\mu X dt + \sigma X dB

I use ito's lemma working towards the solution, and I get this.

\ln X = (\mu - \frac{\sigma ^{2}}{2})t+\sigma B

Now, it seems to me that from here I can treat this as a standard drift diffusion which follows

N'(x,t)=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\sigma\sqrt{2 \pi t}}\exp(-\frac{(x-\mu t)^{2}}{2\sigma ^{2} t})

\hat{\mu}=(\mu - \frac{\sigma ^{2}}{2})t

But now, how to find Var(\ln X)

I try Var(\ln X)=\sigma ^{2} t

In theory, since the random varable can be written X=X_{0}e^{Y}, where Y=(\mu - \frac{\sigma ^{2}}{2})t+\sigma B. We can describe the natural log of \frac{X}{X_{0}} the same way.

N'(\ln \frac{X}{X_{0}},t)=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\sigma\sqrt{2 \pi t}}\exp(-\frac{(\ln X- \ln X_{0}-(\mu - \frac{\sigma ^{2} }{2})t)^{2}}{2\sigma ^{2}t})

Apparently it yields a log-normal distribution for X. According to wikipedia, this is the end result... Notice the extra X in the denominator.

f_{X_t}(X; \mu, \sigma, t) =\displaystyle \frac{1}{X \sigma \sqrt{2 \pi t}}\, \, \exp \left( -\frac{ \left( \ln X - \ln X_0 - \left( \mu - \frac{1}{2} \sigma^2 \right) t \right)^2}{2\sigma^2 t} \right)

Can anyone give me an explanation of where I went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not finding help at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us?
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Back
Top