The Psychology of Human Sexuality

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Human Psychology
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the principles of collision mechanics, specifically differentiating between elastic and inelastic collisions. Elastic collisions conserve both momentum and kinetic energy, while inelastic collisions conserve momentum but not kinetic energy. Advanced concepts such as conservation of angular momentum are also addressed. The provided links offer resources for further exploration of these topics. Understanding these principles is essential for studying the dynamics of physical interactions.
Messages
19,773
Reaction score
10,728
Author: Dr. Donald Luttermoser of East Tennessee State University
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Collisions

Collision concepts
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/colcon.html

Discussion of elastic collision.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elacol2.html

Inelastic collisions
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/inecol.html


A somewhat more advanced discussion of collisional mechanics, which can involve conservation of momentum and/or angular momentum. For elastic collisions, there is conservation of kinetic energy, which is not conserved in inelastic collisions.
http://www.virginia.edu/ep/Interactions/1__introduction_&_collision_kinematics.htm

http://www.virginia.edu/ep/Interactions/class_notes.htm
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top